Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (John Murray, 1859).
Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (John Murray, 1871).
Searcy, W. A. & Andersson, M. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 507–533 (1986).
Google Scholar
MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. in Current Ornithology Vol. 14 (eds Nolan, V. et al.) 81–124 (Springer, 1997).
Darwin, C. & Wallace, A. On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 3, 45–62 (1858).
Google Scholar
Andersson, M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, 1994).
Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218, 384–387 (1982).
Google Scholar
Potvin, D. A., Crawford, P. W., MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. & MacDougall-Shackleton, E. A. Song repertoire size, not territory location, predicts reproductive success and territory tenure in a migratory songbird. Can. J. Zool. 93, 627–633 (2015).
Google Scholar
Searcy, W. A. Song repertoire size and female preferences in song sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14, 281–286 (1984).
Google Scholar
Nowicki, S. & Searcy, W. A. The evolution of vocal learning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 28, 48–53 (2014).
Google Scholar
Nowicki, S., Searcy, W. A. & Peters, S. Quality of song learning affects female response to male bird song. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269, 1949–1954 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. Reproductive development in a female songbird: differential stimulation by quality of male song. Science 192, 574–575 (1976).
Google Scholar
Baker, M. C., Bjerke, T. K., Lampe, H. U. & Espmark, Y. O. Sexual response of female yellowhammers to differences in regional song dialects and repertoire sizes. Anim. Behav. 35, 395–401 (1987).
Google Scholar
Beecher, M. D. & Brenowitz, E. A. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 143–149 (2005).
Google Scholar
Tchernichovski, O., Mitra, P. P., Lints, T. & Nottebohm, F. Dynamics of the vocal imitation process: how a zebra finch learns its song. Science 291, 2564–2569 (2001).
Google Scholar
Lipkind, D. et al. Stepwise acquisition of vocal combinatorial capacity in songbirds and human infants. Nature 498, 104–108 (2013).
Google Scholar
Fehér, O., Wang, H., Saar, S., Mitra, P. P. & Tchernichovski, O. De novo establishment of wild-type song culture in the zebra finch. Nature 459, 564–568 (2009).
Google Scholar
Lauay, C., Gerlach, N. M., Adkins-Regan, E. & DeVoogd, T. J. Female zebra finches require early song exposure to prefer high-quality song as adults. Anim. Behav. 68, 1249–1255 (2004).
Google Scholar
Williams, H., Kilander, K. & Sotanski, M. L. Untutored song, reproductive success and song learning. Anim. Behav. 45, 695–705 (1993).
Google Scholar
Svec, L. A. & Wade, J. Estradiol induces region-specific inhibition of ZENK but does not affect the behavioral preference for tutored song in adult female zebra finches. Behav. Brain Res. 199, 298–306 (2009).
Google Scholar
Williams, H. Choreography of song, dance and beak movements in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). J. Exp. Biol. 204, 3497–3506 (2001).
Google Scholar
Trusel, M. & Roberts, T. F. Neural circuits: how the songbird brain orchestrates courtship displays. Curr. Biol. 33, R351–R353 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ben-Tov, M., Duarte, F. & Mooney, R. A neural hub for holistic courtship displays. Curr. Biol. 33, 1640–1653 (2023).
Google Scholar
Neubauer, R. L. Super-normal length song preferences of female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and a theory of the evolution of bird song. Evol. Ecol. 13, 365–380 (1999).
Google Scholar
Woolley, S. C. & Doupe, A. J. Social context-induced song variation affects female behavior and gene expression. PLoS Biol. 6, e62 (2008).
Google Scholar
Collins, S. A., Hubbard, C. & Houtman, A. M. Female mate choice in the zebra finch — the effect of male beak colour and male song. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35, 21–25 (1994).
Google Scholar
Clayton, N. & Pröve, E. Song discrimination in female zebra finches and Bengalese finches. Anim. Behav. 38, 352–354 (1989).
Google Scholar
Leadbeater, E., Goller, F. & Riebel, K. Unusual phonation, covarying song characteristics and song preferences in female zebra finches. Anim. Behav. 70, 909–919 (2005).
Google Scholar
Ritschard, M., Riebel, K. & Brumm, H. Female zebra finches prefer high-amplitude song. Anim. Behav. 79, 877–883 (2010).
Google Scholar
Riebel, K. in Advances in the Study of Behavior Vol. 40 (eds Naguib, M. et al.) 197–238 (Academic, 2009).
Mol, C., Bolhuis, J. J. & Moorman, S. Vocal learning in songbirds: the role of syllable order in song recognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 376, 20200248 (2021).
Google Scholar
Geberzahn, N. & Derégnaucourt, S. Individual vocal recognition in zebra finches relies on song syllable structure rather than song syllable order. J. Exp. Biol. 223, jeb220087 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lawson, S. L., Fishbein, A. R., Prior, N. H., Ball, G. F. & Dooling, R. J. Relative salience of syllable structure and syllable order in zebra finch song. Anim. Cogn. 21, 467–480 (2018).
Google Scholar
McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for dimension reduction. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426 (2018).
Sainburg, T., Thielk, M. & Gentner, T. Q. Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008228 (2020).
Google Scholar
Goffinet, J., Brudner, S., Mooney, R. & Pearson, J. Low-dimensional learned feature spaces quantify individual and group differences in vocal repertoires. eLife 10, e67855 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sainburg, T., McInnes, L. & Gentner, T. Q. Parametric UMAP embeddings for representation and semisupervised learning. Neural Comput. 33, 2881–2907 (2021).
Google Scholar
Spencer, K. A. & MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. Indicators of development as sexually selected traits: the developmental stress hypothesis in context. Behav. Ecol. 22, 1–9 (2011).
Google Scholar
Nowicki, S., Peters, S. & Podos, J. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am. Zool. 38, 179–190 (1998).
Google Scholar
Nowicki, S., Searcy, W. & Peters, S. Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the “nutritional stress hypothesis”. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188, 1003–1014 (2002).
Google Scholar
Tchernichovski, O., Eisenberg-Edidin, S. & Jarvis, E. D. Balanced imitation sustains song culture in zebra finches. Nat. Commun. 12, 2562 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tchernichovski, O., Nottebohm, F., Ho, C. E., Pesaran, B. & Mitra, P. P. A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity. Anim. Behav. 59, 1167–1176 (2000).
Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Google Scholar
Mathis, A. et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1281–1289 (2018).
Google Scholar
McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Astels, S. hdbscan: hierarchical density based clustering. J. Open Source Softw. 2, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00205 (2017).