Strange IndiaStrange India


  • Burt, R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 349–399 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. F. The rise of research teams: benefits and costs in economics. J. Econ. Perspect. 35, 191–216 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishna, M. & Henrich, J. Innovation in the collective brain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150192 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. & Uzzi, B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316, 1036–1039 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J. & Webb, M. Are ideas getting harder to find? Am. Econ. Rev. 110, 1104–1144 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, M., Leahey, E. & Funk, R. J. Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature 613, 138–144 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. Recombinant growth. Q. J. Econ. 113, 331–360 (1998).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M. & Jones, B. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342, 468–472 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension (Univ. Chicago Press, 1966).

  • Jones, B. F. The burden of knowledge and the ‘death of the renaissance man’: is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econ. Stud. 76, 283–317 (2009).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, E. & Reikowsky, R. C. Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology. Soc. Stud. Sci. 38, 425–440 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. N. & Kiesler, S. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Soc. Stud. Sci. 35, 703–722 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., Ganguli, I. & Murciano-Goroff, R. Why and Wherefore of Increased Scientific Collaboration Working Paper 19819 (NBER, 2014); https://doi.org/10.3386/w19819.

  • Fleming, L., Mingo, S. & Chen, D. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Adm. Sci. Q. 52, 443–475 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, N. Geographic distribution of R&D activity: how does it affect innovation quality? Acad. Manage. J. 53, 1194–1209 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P., Bathelt, H. & Malmberg, A. Building global knowledge pipelines: the role of temporary clusters. Eur. Plan. Stud. 14, 997–1013 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12, 346–371 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, P., Zivin, J. S. G. & Sampat, B. The Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge across Time and Space: Evidence from Professional Transitions for the Superstars of Medicine Working Paper 16683 (NBER, 2011); https://doi.org/10.3386/w16683.

  • Catalini, C. Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Manage. Sci. 64, 4348–4364 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brucks, M. S. & Levav, J. Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation. Nature 605, 108–112 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. et al. The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 43–54 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, F., Wu, L. & Evans, J. Flat teams drive scientific innovation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2200927119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E. Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: a cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev. 35, 579–603 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, P., Fons-Rosen, C. & Zivin, J. S. G. Does science advance one funeral at a time? Am. Econ. Rev. 109, 2889–2920 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., Wang, D. & Evans, J. A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature 566, 378–382 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J. & Ying, Z. J. Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Q. J. Econ. 130, 165–218 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P. J. & Bailey, D. E. Out of sight, out of sync: understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14, 615–632 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P. J. & Weisband, S. P. in Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness (eds Gibson, C. B. & Cohen, S. G.) 21–36 (Wiley, 2003).

  • Funk, R. J., & Owen-Smith, J. A dynamic network measure of technological change. Manage. Sci. 63, 791–817 (2017).

  • Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737–738 (1953).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Orús, R. & Vidal, G. Infinite time-evolving block decimation algorithm beyond unitary evolution. Phys. Rev. B 78, 155117 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamano, M., Okuda, H., Yajima, H., Hirose, T. & Kagaya, N. Retrieval method using image information. US patent US5857199A (1999).

  • Waltman, L., Tijssen, R. J. W. & van Eck, N. J. Globalisation of science in kilometres. J. Informetr. 5, 574–582 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S. & Cummings, J. N. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. Distributed Work 1, 57–80 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noorden, R. Global mobility: science on the move. Nature 490, 326–329 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Holten, D. & van Wijk, J. J. Force-directed edge bundling for graph visualization. Comput. Graph. Forum 28, 983–990 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K. et al. Microsoft Academic Graph: when experts are not enough. Quant. Sci. Stud. 1, 396–413 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Z., Ma, H. & Wang, K. A Web-scale system for scientific knowledge exploration. In Proc. ACL 2018, System Demonstrations 87–92 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018); https://aclanthology.org/P18-4015/.

  • Rajkumar, K., Saint-Jacques, G., Bojinov, I., Brynjolfsson, E. & Aral, S. A causal test of the strength of weak ties. Science 377, 1304–1310 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenberg, M., Jaffe, A. B. & Lachman, M. The Age of Invention: Matching Inventor Ages to Patents Based on Web-Scraped Sources Working Paper 28768 (NBER, 2021); https://www.nber.org/papers/w28768.

  • Haeussler, C. & Sauermann, H. Division of labor in collaborative knowledge production: the role of team size and interdisciplinarity. Res. Policy 49, 103987 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, H., Wu, L. & Evans, J. A. Aging scientists and slowed advance. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04044 (2022).

  • Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360–1380 (1973).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mors, M. L. & Waguespack, D. M. Fast success and slow failure: the process speed of dispersed research teams. Res. Policy 50, 104222 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia, S. Correia S. reghdfe: Estimating linear models with multi-way fixed effects. 2016 Stata Conference https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/bocscon16/24.htm (2016).



  • Source link

    By AUTHOR

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *