Shifrut, E. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens in primary human T cells reveal key regulators of immune function. Cell 175, 1958–1971.e15 (2018).
Google Scholar
Carnevale, J. et al. RASA2 ablation in T cells boosts antigen sensitivity and long-term function. Nature 609, 174–182 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. et al. CRISPR activation and interference screens decode stimulation responses in primary human T cells. Science 375, eabj4008 (2022).
Google Scholar
Belk, J. A. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens of T cell exhaustion identify chromatin remodeling factors that limit T cell persistence. Cancer Cell 40, 768–786.e7 (2022).
Google Scholar
Henriksson, J. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens in T helper cells reveal pervasive crosstalk between activation and differentiation. Cell 176, 882–896.e18 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ye, L. et al. A genome-scale gain-of-function CRISPR screen in CD8 T cells identifies proline metabolism as a means to enhance CAR-T therapy. Cell Metab. 34, 595–614.e14 (2022).
Google Scholar
Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420–424 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sangree, A. K. et al. Benchmarking of SpCas9 variants enables deeper base editor screens of BRCA1 and BCL2. Nat. Commun. 13, 1318 (2022).
Google Scholar
Parlakpinar, H. & Gunata, M. Transplantation and immunosuppression: a review of novel transplant-related immunosuppressant drugs. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 43, 651–665 (2021).
Google Scholar
Freimer, J. W. et al. Systematic discovery and perturbation of regulatory genes in human T cells reveals the architecture of immune networks. Nat. Genet. 54, 1133–1144 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hanna, R. E. et al. Massively parallel assessment of human variants with base editor screens. Cell 184, 1064–1080.e20 (2021).
Google Scholar
Coelho, M. A. et al. Base editing screens map mutations affecting interferon-γ signaling in cancer. Cancer Cell 41, 288–303.e6 (2023).
Google Scholar
Georgiadis, C. et al. Base-edited CAR T cells for combinational therapy against T cell malignancies. Leukemia 35, 3466–3481 (2021).
Google Scholar
Diorio, C. et al. Cytosine base editing enables quadruple-edited allogeneic CART cells for T-ALL. Blood 140, 619–629 (2022).
Google Scholar
Richter, M. F. et al. Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 883–891 (2020).
Google Scholar
Thuronyi, B. W. et al. Continuous evolution of base editors with expanded target compatibility and improved activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1070–1079 (2019).
Google Scholar
Smith-Garvin, J. E., Koretzky, G. A. & Jordan, M. S. T cell activation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 591–619 (2009).
Google Scholar
Henikoff, S. & Henikoff, J. G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10915–10919 (1992).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2022).
Google Scholar
Winston, J. T. et al. The SCFβ-TRCP–ubiquitin ligase complex associates specifically with phosphorylated destruction motifs in IκBα and β-catenin and stimulates IκBα ubiquitination in vitro. Genes Dev. 13, 270–283 (1999).
Google Scholar
Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Directed evolution of adenine base editors with increased activity and therapeutic application. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 892–900 (2020).
Google Scholar
Glaser, V. et al. Combining different CRISPR nucleases for simultaneous knock-in and base editing prevents translocations in multiplex-edited CAR T cells. Genome Biol. 24, 89 (2023).
Google Scholar
Webber, B. R. et al. Highly efficient multiplex human T cell engineering without double-strand breaks using Cas9 base editors. Nat. Commun. 10, 5222 (2019).
Google Scholar
Robbins, P. F. et al. Single and dual amino acid substitutions in TCR CDRs can enhance antigen-specific T cell functions. J. Immunol. 180, 6116–6131 (2008).
Google Scholar
Singh, A., Joshi, V., Jindal, A. K., Mathew, B. & Rawat, A. An updated review on activated PI3 kinase delta syndrome (APDS). Genes Dis 7, 67–74 (2020).
Google Scholar
Singh, M. D., Ni, M., Sullivan, J. M., Hamerman, J. A. & Campbell, D. J. B cell adaptor for PI3-kinase (BCAP) modulates CD8+ effector and memory T cell differentiation. J. Exp. Med. 215, 2429–2443 (2018).
Google Scholar
Crank, M. C. et al. Mutations in PIK3CD can cause hyper IgM syndrome (HIGM) associated with increased cancer susceptibility. J. Clin. Immunol. 34, 272–276 (2014).
Google Scholar
Thauland, T. J., Pellerin, L., Ohgami, R. S., Bacchetta, R. & Butte, M. J. Case study: mechanism for increased follicular helper T cell development in activated PI3K delta syndrome. Front. Immunol. 10, 753 (2019).
Google Scholar
Xu, L. et al. Efficient precise in vivo base editing in adult dystrophic mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 3719 (2021).
Google Scholar
Walton, R. T., Christie, K. A., Whittaker, M. N. & Kleinstiver, B. P. Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR–Cas9 variants. Science 368, 290–296 (2020).
Google Scholar
Massaad, M. J., Ramesh, N. & Geha, R. S. Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome: a comprehensive review. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1285, 26–43 (2013).
Google Scholar
Methot, J. L. et al. Optimization of Versatile Oxindoles as Selective PI3Kδ Inhibitors. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 11, 2461–2469 (2020).
Google Scholar
Appleby, M. W. & Ramsdell, F. A forward-genetic approach for analysis of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 463–471 (2003).
Google Scholar
Martin-Rufino, J. D. et al. Massively parallel base editing to map variant effects in human hematopoiesis. Cell 186, 2456–2474.e24 (2023).
Google Scholar
Neugebauer, M. E. et al. Evolution of an adenine base editor into a small, efficient cytosine base editor with low off-target activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 673–685 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. Integrative dissection of gene regulatory elements at base resolution. Cell Genomics 3, 100318 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zeng, J. et al. Therapeutic base editing of human hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Med. 26, 535–541 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jia, Y. et al. Hyperactive PI3Kδ predisposes naive T cells to activation via aerobic glycolysis programs. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 18, 1783–1797 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lucas, C. L. et al. Dominant-activating germline mutations in the gene encoding the PI(3)K catalytic subunit p110δ result in T cell senescence and human immunodeficiency. Nat. Immunol. 15, 88–97 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lucas, C. L., Chandra, A., Nejentsev, S., Condliffe, A. M. & Okkenhaug, K. PI3Kδ and primary immunodeficiencies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 702–714 (2016).
Google Scholar
Robles-Valero, J. et al. Cancer-associated mutations in VAV1 trigger variegated signaling outputs and T-cell lymphomagenesis. EMBO J. 40, e108125 (2021).
Google Scholar
Prawiro, C. et al. A frequent PLCγ1 mutation in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma determines functional properties of the malignant cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1869, 166601 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fraietta, J. A. et al. Determinants of response and resistance to CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat. Med. 24, 563–571 (2018).
Google Scholar
Long, A. H. et al. 4-1BB costimulation ameliorates T cell exhaustion induced by tonic signaling of chimeric antigen receptors. Nat. Med. 21, 581–590 (2015).
Google Scholar
Feucht, J. et al. Calibration of CAR activation potential directs alternative T cell fates and therapeutic potency. Nat. Med. 25, 82–88 (2019).
Google Scholar
Guedan, S. et al. Single residue in CD28-costimulated CAR-T cells limits long-term persistence and antitumor durability. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 3087–3097 (2020).
Google Scholar
Parnas, O. et al. A genome-wide CRISPR screen in primary immune cells to dissect regulatory networks. Cell 162, 675–686 (2015).
Google Scholar
Shang, W. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies FAM49B as a key regulator of actin dynamics and T cell activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4051–E4060 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dong, M. B. et al. Systematic immunotherapy target discovery using genome-scale in vivo CRISPR screens in CD8 T cells. Cell 178, 1189–1204.e23 (2019).
Google Scholar
Halperin, S. O. et al. CRISPR-guided DNA polymerases enable diversification of all nucleotides in a tunable window. Nature 560, 248–252 (2018).
Google Scholar
Roth, T. L. et al. Pooled knockin targeting for genome engineering of cellular immunotherapies. Cell 181, 728–744.e21 (2020).
Google Scholar
Clement, K. et al. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 224–226 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sanson, K. R. et al. Optimized libraries for CRISPR–Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities. Nat. Commun. 9, 5416 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, P. J. et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 184, 5635–5652.e29 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jiang, T. et al. Chemical modifications of adenine base editor mRNA and guide RNA expand its application scope. Nat. Commun. 11, 1979 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shy, B. R. et al. High-yield genome engineering in primary cells using a hybrid ssDNA repair template and small-molecule cocktails. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 521–531 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 15, 554 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bae, S., Park, J. & Kim, J.-S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics 30, 1473–1475 (2014).
Google Scholar
Doench, J. G. et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR–Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 184–191 (2016).
Google Scholar
Concordet, J.-P. & Haeussler, M. CRISPOR: intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W242–W245 (2018).
Google Scholar
Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D1062–D1067 (2018).
Google Scholar