Ben-David, U. & Amon, A. Context is everything: aneuploidy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 44–62 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ghandi, M. et al. Next-generation characterization of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. Nature 569, 503–508 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tsherniak, A. et al. Defining a cancer dependency map. Cell 170, 564–576.e16 (2017).
Google Scholar
McDonald, E. R. III et al. Project DRIVE: a compendium of cancer dependencies and synthetic lethal relationships uncovered by large-scale, deep RNAi screening. Cell 170, 577–592.e10 (2017).
Google Scholar
Aguirre, A. J. et al. Genomic copy number dictates a gene-independent cell response to CRISPR/Cas9 targeting. Cancer Discov. 6, 914–929 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yang, W. et al. Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D955–D961 (2013).
Google Scholar
Basu, A. et al. An interactive resource to identify cancer genetic and lineage dependencies targeted by small molecules. Cell 154, 1151–1161 (2013).
Google Scholar
Garnett, M. J. et al. Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells. Nature 483, 570–575 (2012).
Google Scholar
Corsello, S. M. et al. Discovering the anticancer potential of non-oncology drugs by systematic viability profiling. Nat. Cancer 1, 235–248 (2020).
Google Scholar
Musacchio, A. & Salmon, E. D. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379–393 (2007).
Google Scholar
Zack, T. I. et al. Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy number alteration. Nat. Genet. 45, 1134–1140 (2013).
Google Scholar
Taylor, A. M. et al. Genomic and functional approaches to understanding cancer aneuploidy. Cancer Cell 33, 676–689.e3 (2018).
Google Scholar
Knouse, K. A., Wu, J., Whittaker, C. A. & Amon, A. Single cell sequencing reveals low levels of aneuploidy across mammalian tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13409–13414 (2014).
Google Scholar
Oromendia, A. B., Dodgson, S. E. & Amon, A. Aneuploidy causes proteotoxic stress in yeast. Genes Dev. 26, 2696–2708 (2012).
Google Scholar
Torres, E. M. et al. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317, 916–924 (2007).
Google Scholar
Hwang, S. et al. Serine-dependent sphingolipid synthesis is a metabolic liability of aneuploid cells. Cell Rep. 21, 3807–3818 (2017).
Google Scholar
Storchová, Z. et al. Genome-wide genetic analysis of polyploidy in yeast. Nature 443, 541–547 (2006).
Google Scholar
Ben-David, U. et al. Patient-derived xenografts undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution. Nat. Genet. 49, 1567–1575 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kops, G. J. P. L., Foltz, D. R. & Cleveland, D. W. Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8699–8704 (2004).
Google Scholar
Wild, T. et al. The spindle assembly checkpoint is not essential for viability of human cells with genetically lowered APC/C activity. Cell Rep. 14, 1829–1840 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chunduri, N. K. & Storchová, Z. The diverse consequences of aneuploidy. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 54–62 (2019).
Google Scholar
Baker, D. J., Jin, F., Jeganathan, K. B. & van Deursen, J. M. Whole chromosome instability caused by Bub1 insufficiency drives tumorigenesis through tumor suppressor gene loss of heterozygosity. Cancer Cell 16, 475–486 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ricke, R. M., Jeganathan, K. B. & van Deursen, J. M. Bub1 overexpression induces aneuploidy and tumor formation through Aurora B kinase hyperactivation. J. Cell Biol. 193, 1049–1064 (2011).
Google Scholar
Foijer, F. et al. Chromosome instability induced by Mps1 and p53 mutation generates aggressive lymphomas exhibiting aneuploidy-induced stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13427–13432 (2014).
Google Scholar
Foijer, F. et al. Deletion of the MAD2L1 spindle assembly checkpoint gene is tolerated in mouse models of acute T-cell lymphoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. eLife 6, e20873 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sotillo, R. et al. Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Cell 11, 9–23 (2007).
Google Scholar
Sotillo, R., Schvartzman, J. M., Socci, N. D. & Benezra, R. Mad2-induced chromosome instability leads to lung tumour relapse after oncogene withdrawal. Nature 464, 436–440 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mason, J. M. et al. Functional characterization of CFI-402257, a potent and selective Mps1/TTK kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3127–3132 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pauer, L. R. et al. Phase I study of oral CI-994 in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Invest. 22, 886–896 (2004).
Google Scholar
Bielski, C. M. et al. Genome doubling shapes the evolution and prognosis of advanced cancers. Nat. Genet. 50, 1189–1195 (2018).
Google Scholar
Carter, S. L. et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 413–421 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hieronymus, H. et al. Tumor copy number alteration burden is a pan-cancer prognostic factor associated with recurrence and death. eLife 7, e37294 (2018).
Google Scholar
Smith, J. C. & Sheltzer, J. M. Systematic identification of mutations and copy number alterations associated with cancer patient prognosis. eLife 7, e39217 (2018).
Google Scholar
Soto, M., García-Santisteban, I., Krenning, L., Medema, R. H. & Raaijmakers, J. A. Chromosomes trapped in micronuclei are liable to segregation errors. J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs214742 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, C. Z. et al. Chromothripsis from DNA damage in micronuclei. Nature 522, 179–184 (2015).
Google Scholar
Burgess, A., Rasouli, M. & Rogers, S. Stressing mitosis to death. Front. Oncol. 4, 140 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dominguez-Brauer, C. et al. Targeting mitosis in cancer: emerging strategies. Mol. Cell 60, 524–536 (2015).
Google Scholar
Santaguida, S., Tighe, A., D’Alise, A. M., Taylor, S. S. & Musacchio, A. Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J. Cell Biol. 190, 73–87 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A. Y. et al. Chromosomal instability, tolerance of mitotic errors and multidrug resistance are promoted by tetraploidization in human cells. Cell Cycle 14, 2810–2820 (2015).
Google Scholar
Santaguida, S. et al. Chromosome mis-segregation generates cell-cycle-arrested cells with complex karyotypes that are eliminated by the immune system. Dev. Cell 41, 638–651.e5 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bakker, B. et al. Single-cell sequencing reveals karyotype heterogeneity in murine and human malignancies. Genome Biol. 17, 115 (2016).
Google Scholar
Weaver, L. N. et al. Kif18A uses a microtubule binding site in the tail for plus-end localization and spindle length regulation. Curr. Biol. 21, 1500–1506 (2011).
Google Scholar
Czechanski, A. et al. Kif18a is specifically required for mitotic progression during germ line development. Dev. Biol. 402, 253–262 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wordeman, L., Decarreau, J., Vicente, J. J. & Wagenbach, M. Divergent microtubule assembly rates after short- versus long-term loss of end-modulating kinesins. Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 1300–1309 (2016).
Google Scholar
Marquis, C. et al. Chromosomally unstable tumor cells specifically require KIF18A for proliferation. Nat. Comm. (in the press).
Quinton, R. J. et al. Whole-genome doubling confers unique genetic vulnerabilities on tumour cells. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03133-3 (2021).
Braun, J. et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of optimized inhibitors of the mitotic kinesin Kif18A. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 554–560 (2015).
Google Scholar
McFarland, J. M. et al. Improved estimation of cancer dependencies from large-scale RNAi screens using model-based normalization and data integration. Nat. Commun. 9, 4610 (2018).
Google Scholar
Seashore-Ludlow, B. et al. Harnessing connectivity in a large-scale small-molecule sensitivity dataset. Cancer Discov. 5, 1210–1223 (2015).
Google Scholar
Rees, M. G. et al. Correlating chemical sensitivity and basal gene expression reveals mechanism of action. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 109–116 (2016).
Google Scholar
Iorio, F. et al. A landscape of pharmacogenomic interactions in cancer. Cell 166, 740–754 (2016).
Google Scholar
Nusinow, D. P. et al. Quantitative proteomics of the cancer cell line encyclopedia. Cell 180, 387–402.e16 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chan, E. M. et al. WRN helicase is a synthetic lethal target in microsatellite unstable cancers. Nature 568, 551–556 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
Google Scholar
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57, 289–300 (1995).
Google Scholar
Sheltzer, J. M. A transcriptional and metabolic signature of primary aneuploidy is present in chromosomally unstable cancer cells and informs clinical prognosis. Cancer Res. 73, 6401–6412 (2013).
Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Google Scholar
R core team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).
Huang, D. W. et al. DAVID Bioinformatics Resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W169–W175 (2007).
Google Scholar
Dempster, J. M. et al. Extracting biological insights from the Project Achilles Genome-Scale CRISPR Screens in cancer cell lines. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/720243 (2019).
Berg, S. et al. ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1226–1232 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mayr, M. I. et al. The human kinesin Kif18A is a motile microtubule depolymerase essential for chromosome congression. Curr. Biol. 17, 488–498 (2007).
Google Scholar
Subramanian, A. et al. A next generation connectivity map: L1000 platform and the first 1,000,000 profiles. Cell 171, 1437–1452.e17 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ben-David, U. et al. Genetic and transcriptional evolution alters cancer cell line drug response. Nature 560, 325–330 (2018).
Google Scholar
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
Google Scholar
Korotkevich, G. et al. Fast gene set enrichment analysis. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/060012 (2016).
Liberzon, A. et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics 27, 1739–1740 (2011).
Google Scholar
Dürrbaum, M. et al. Unique features of the transcriptional response to model aneuploidy in human cells. BMC Genomics 15, 139 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lee, K. & Rhee, K. PLK1 phosphorylation of pericentrin initiates centrosome maturation at the onset of mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 195, 1093–1101 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lai, D. & Shah, S. HMMcopy: copy number prediction with correction for GC and mappability bias for HTS data. https://rdrr.io/bioc/HMMcopy/ (2012).
Knouse, K. A., Wu, J. & Amon, A. Assessment of megabase-scale somatic copy number variation using single-cell sequencing. Genome Res. 26, 376–384 (2016).
Google Scholar
van den Bos, H. et al. in Cellular Senescence. Methods in Molecular Biology (ed. Demaria, M.) (Humana, 2019).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Google Scholar
Jun, G., Wing, M. K., Abecasis, G. R. & Kang, H. M. An efficient and scalable analysis framework for variant extraction and refinement from population-scale DNA sequence data. Genome Res. 25, 918–925 (2015).
Google Scholar
van den Bos, H. et al. Single-cell whole genome sequencing reveals no evidence for common aneuploidy in normal and Alzheimer’s disease neurons. Genome Biol. 17, 116 (2016).
Google Scholar