Strange IndiaStrange India



The Solicitor General, on behalf of the Centre, said that “sometimes media reports are wrong”.New Delhi: The Supreme Court today objected to recent remarks by Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju on the collegium system of appointing judges, saying it should not have happened. It also flagged the issue of Centre delaying appointments in the higher judiciary, saying it cannot hold the names back without stating its reservations.”When someone in a high position says that…it should not have happened”, a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and AS Oka said.Mr Rijiju, who barely hides his dissatisfaction with the government not having more say in appointing judges to the top court, launched a fresh attack on the current appointment mechanism, saying the collegium system is “alien” to the Constitution. The Supreme Court in its wisdom, through a court ruling, created the collegium, he had said, noting that before 1991 all judges were appointed by the government.”Mr Attorney General, I have ignored all press reports, but this has come from somebody high enough also with an interview…I am not saying anything else. If we have to, we will take a decision,” said Justice Kaul to Attorney General R Venkataramani who was representing the Centre.”Please resolve this and don’t make us take a judicial decision in this regard,” the bench added.The Solicitor General, on behalf of the Centre, said that “sometimes media reports are wrong”.Speaking at the Times Now Summit, the Law Minister had said the Constitution of India is a “religious document” for everyone, especially the government. “Anything which is alien to the Constitution merely because of the decision taken by the courts or some judges, how do you expect that the decision will be backed by the country,” he had asked.On delays in appointments, the court asked if the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) not passing muster was the reason that the government is not happy, and is hence not clearing names.The court asked the Attorney General and Solicitor General to convey the sentiments of the court to the Centre over delay in clearing names for higher judiciary recommended by the Supreme Court collegium.”The ground reality is…names are not being cleared. How will the system work? Some names are pending for the last one and half years,” the Supreme Court said.”It cannot be that you can withhold names, it frustrates the whole system…And sometimes when you appoint, you pick up some names from the list and not clear others. What you do is you effectively disrupt the seniority,” the court added.The Supreme Court further said that many recommendations are pending for four months, and have crossed the time limit. Timelines have to be adhered to, it said.The top court, while requesting the Centre to resolve the issue, mentioned that one lawyer whose name was recommended has died while another has withdrawn consent. 



Source link

By AUTHOR

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *