Strange India All Strange Things About India and world


  • Dekker, J. & Mirny, L. The 3D genome as moderator of chromosomal communication. Cell 164, 1110–1121 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M. & Ren, B. The three-dimensional organization of mammalian genomes. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 265–289 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann, M., Lupianez, D. G. & Mundlos, S. Structural variation in the 3D genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 453–467 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghavi-Helm, Y. et al. Highly rearranged chromosomes reveal uncoupling between genome topology and gene expression. Nat. Genet. 51, 1272–1282 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Akdemir, K. C. et al. Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer. Nat. Genet. 52, 294–305 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., Cattoglio, C. & Tjian, R. Looping back to leap forward: transcription enters a new era. Cell 157, 13–25 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, P. et al. Translocations among antibody genes in human cancer. Science 222, 765–771 (1983).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, R. et al. Translocation of the c-myc gene into the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in human Burkitt lymphoma and murine plasmacytoma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 7837–7841 (1982).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weischenfeldt, J. et al. Pan-cancer analysis of somatic copy-number alterations implicates IRS4 and IGF2 in enhancer hijacking. Nat. Genet. 49, 65–74 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcott, P. A. et al. Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Nature 511, 428–434 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Peifer, M. et al. Telomerase activation by genomic rearrangements in high-risk neuroblastoma. Nature 526, 700–704 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Groschel, S. et al. A single oncogenic enhancer rearrangement causes concomitant EVI1 and GATA2 deregulation in leukemia. Cell 157, 369–381 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hnisz, D. et al. Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods. Science 351, 1454–1458 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. et al. Genome-wide detection of enhancer-hijacking events from chromatin interaction data in rearranged genomes. Nat. Methods 18, 661–668 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavahan, W. A. et al. Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas. Nature 529, 110–114 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavahan, W. A. et al. Altered chromosomal topology drives oncogenic programs in SDH-deficient GISTs. Nature 575, 229–233 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. R. et al. Integrative detection and analysis of structural variation in cancer genomes. Nat. Genet. 50, 1388–1398 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barutcu, A. R. et al. RUNX1 contributes to higher-order chromatin organization and gene regulation in breast cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1859, 1389–1397 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Harewood, L. et al. Hi-C as a tool for precise detection and characterisation of chromosomal rearrangements and copy number variation in human tumours. Genome Biol. 18, 125 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. et al. The properties of genome conformation and spatial gene interaction and regulation networks of normal and malignant human cell types. PLoS One 8, e58793 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Taberlay, P. C. et al. Three-dimensional disorganization of the cancer genome occurs coincident with long-range genetic and epigenetic alterations. Genome Res. 26, 719–731 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y. et al. CRISPR inversion of CTCF sites alters genome topology and enhancer/promoter function. Cell 162, 900–910 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Akdemir, K. C. et al. Somatic mutation distributions in cancer genomes vary with three-dimensional chromatin structure. Nat. Genet. 52, 1178–1188 (2020).

  • Consortium, E. P. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119–1125 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Engreitz, J. M., Agarwala, V. & Mirny, L. A. Three-dimensional genome architecture influences partner selection for chromosomal translocations in human disease. PLoS One 7, e44196 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumova, N. et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342, 948–953 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaman, L. et al. Nucleome analysis reveals structure-function relationships for colon cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 15, 821–830 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcotte, R. et al. Functional genomic landscape of human breast cancer drivers, vulnerabilities, and resistance. Cell 164, 293–309 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngoc, P. C. T. et al. Identification of novel lncRNAs regulated by the TAL1 complex in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 32, 2138–2151 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Harenza, J. L. et al. Transcriptomic profiling of 39 commonly-used neuroblastoma cell lines. Sci. Data 4, 170033 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Korbel, J. O. & Campbell, P. J. Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes. Cell 152, 1226–1236 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baca, S. C. et al. Punctuated evolution of prostate cancer genomes. Cell 153, 666–677 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes-Ciriano, I. et al. Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing. Nat. Genet. 52, 331–341 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, P. J. et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144, 27–40 (2011).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcato, M. et al. Comparison of computational methods for Hi-C data analysis. Nat. Methods 14, 679–685 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, I. F. & Peters, J. M. Genome folding through loop extrusion by SMC complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 445–464 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloza, L., Ribera-Cortada, I. & Campo, E. Mantle cell lymphoma pathology update in the 2016 WHO classification. Ann. Lymphoma 3, 2616–2695 (2019).

  • Canela, A. et al. Genome organization drives chromosome fragility. Cell 170, 507–521 e518 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Transcriptionally active HERV-H retrotransposons demarcate topologically associating domains in human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Genet. 51, 1380–1388 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. R. et al. Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation. Nature 518, 331–336 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuijers, J. et al. Transcriptional dysregulation of MYC reveals common enhancer-docking mechanism. Cell Rep. 23, 349–360 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J. et al. Role of SWI/SNF in acute leukemia maintenance and enhancer-mediated Myc regulation. Genes Dev. 27, 2648–2662 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulco, C. P. et al. Systematic mapping of functional enhancer-promoter connections with CRISPR interference. Science 354, 769–773 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Beroukhim, R. et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 463, 899–905 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M. D. & Leon, J. Myc roles in hematopoiesis and leukemia. Genes Cancer 1, 605–616 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. et al. Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes. Nature 578, 112–121 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148, 908–921 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber, D. A. et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 127, 2391–2405 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, L. A. Sarcoma classification: an update based on the 2013 World Health Organization classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone. Cancer 120, 1763–1774 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. W. et al. MYC drives a subset of high-risk pediatric neuroblastomas and is activated through mechanisms including enhancer hijacking and focal enhancer amplification. Cancer Discov. 8, 320–335 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulco, C. P. et al. Activity-by-contact model of enhancer-promoter regulation from thousands of CRISPR perturbations. Nat. Genet. 51, 1664–1669 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. Sequence-based modeling of three-dimensional genome architecture from kilobase to chromosome scale. Nat. Genet. 54, 725–734 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. A. et al. The human transcription factors. Cell 172, 650–665 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradner, J. E., Hnisz, D. & Young, R. A. Transcriptional addiction in cancer. Cell 168, 629–643 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, E. et al. Role of non-coding sequence variants in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 93–108 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupianez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012–1025 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuin, J. et al. Nonlinear control of transcription through enhancer-promoter interactions. Nature 604, 571–577 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvaraj, S., J, R. D., Bansal, V. & Ren, B. Whole-genome haplotype reconstruction using proximity-ligation and shotgun sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1111–1118 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge, P., Bafna, V. & Bansal, V. HapCUT2: robust and accurate haplotype assembly for diverse sequencing technologies. Genome Res. 27, 801–812 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, B. J. et al. Accuracy assessment of fusion transcript detection via read-mapping and de novo fusion transcript assembly-based methods. Genome Biol. 20, 213 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).

  • Imakaev, M. et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nat. Methods 9, 999–1003 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Consortium, I. T. P.-C. A. o. W. G. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 578, 82–93 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Y. et al. Targeting of super-enhancers and mutant BRAF can suppress growth of BRAF-mutant colon cancer cells via repression of MAPK signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 402, 100–109 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaferia, G. R. et al. Dissection of transcriptional and cis-regulatory control of differentiation in human pancreatic cancer. EMBO J. 35, 595–617 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, B. J. et al. Small genomic insertions form enhancers that misregulate oncogenes. Nat. Commun. 8, 14385 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalender Atak, Z. et al. Identification of cis-regulatory mutations generating de novo edges in personalized cancer gene regulatory networks. Genome Med. 9, 80 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. J. et al. Detection of enhancer-associated rearrangements reveals mechanisms of oncogene dysregulation in B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Discov. 5, 1058–1071 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, A. A., Sprunger, D. M. & Venters, B. J. Epigenetic and transcriptional profiling of triple negative breast cancer. Sci. Data 6, 190033 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco, H. L. et al. Enhancer transcription reveals subtype-specific gene expression programs controlling breast cancer pathogenesis. Genome Res. 28, 159–170 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. et al. CDK7-dependent transcriptional addiction in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell 163, 174–186 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, C. et al. Combined cistrome and transcriptome analysis of SKI in AML cells identifies SKI as a co-repressor for RUNX1. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 3412–3428 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. A. et al. Optimized ChIP-seq method facilitates transcription factor profiling in human tumors. Life Sci. Alliance 2, e201800115 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N. Q. et al. The non-coding variant rs1800734 enhances DCLK3 expression through long-range interaction and promotes colorectal cancer progression. Nat. Commun. 8, 14418 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, L. et al. ENL links histone acetylation to oncogenic gene expression in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature 543, 265–269 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, S. et al. Eradication of central nervous system leukemia of T-cell origin with a brain-permeable LSD1 inhibitor. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 1601–1611 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, M. R. et al. Oncogene regulation. An oncogenic super-enhancer formed through somatic mutation of a noncoding intergenic element. Science 346, 1373–1377 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliades, P. et al. High MITF expression is associated with super-enhancers and suppressed by CDK7 inhibition in melanoma. J. Invest. Dermatol. 138, 1582–1590 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeva, V. et al. Heterogeneity of neuroblastoma cell identity defined by transcriptional circuitries. Nat. Genet. 49, 1408–1413 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. J. et al. Hotspots of aberrant enhancer activity punctuate the colorectal cancer epigenome. Nat. Commun. 8, 14400 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenciaga, A. et al. Transcriptional targeting of oncogene addiction in medullary thyroid cancer. JCI Insight 3, e122225 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. et al. Symbiotic macrophage-glioma cell interactions reveal synthetic lethality in PTEN-null glioma. Cancer Cell 35, 868–884 e866 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Adrian Alexa, J. R. topGO: Enrichment analysis for gene ontology. R package version 2.48.0 https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.bioc.topGO (2022).



  • Source link

    By AUTHOR

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *