Dekker, J. & Mirny, L. The 3D genome as moderator of chromosomal communication. Cell 164, 1110–1121 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yu, M. & Ren, B. The three-dimensional organization of mammalian genomes. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 265–289 (2017).
Google Scholar
Spielmann, M., Lupianez, D. G. & Mundlos, S. Structural variation in the 3D genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 453–467 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ghavi-Helm, Y. et al. Highly rearranged chromosomes reveal uncoupling between genome topology and gene expression. Nat. Genet. 51, 1272–1282 (2019).
Google Scholar
Akdemir, K. C. et al. Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer. Nat. Genet. 52, 294–305 (2020).
Google Scholar
Levine, M., Cattoglio, C. & Tjian, R. Looping back to leap forward: transcription enters a new era. Cell 157, 13–25 (2014).
Google Scholar
Leder, P. et al. Translocations among antibody genes in human cancer. Science 222, 765–771 (1983).
Google Scholar
Taub, R. et al. Translocation of the c-myc gene into the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in human Burkitt lymphoma and murine plasmacytoma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 7837–7841 (1982).
Google Scholar
Weischenfeldt, J. et al. Pan-cancer analysis of somatic copy-number alterations implicates IRS4 and IGF2 in enhancer hijacking. Nat. Genet. 49, 65–74 (2017).
Google Scholar
Northcott, P. A. et al. Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Nature 511, 428–434 (2014).
Google Scholar
Peifer, M. et al. Telomerase activation by genomic rearrangements in high-risk neuroblastoma. Nature 526, 700–704 (2015).
Google Scholar
Groschel, S. et al. A single oncogenic enhancer rearrangement causes concomitant EVI1 and GATA2 deregulation in leukemia. Cell 157, 369–381 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hnisz, D. et al. Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods. Science 351, 1454–1458 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Genome-wide detection of enhancer-hijacking events from chromatin interaction data in rearranged genomes. Nat. Methods 18, 661–668 (2021).
Google Scholar
Flavahan, W. A. et al. Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas. Nature 529, 110–114 (2016).
Google Scholar
Flavahan, W. A. et al. Altered chromosomal topology drives oncogenic programs in SDH-deficient GISTs. Nature 575, 229–233 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dixon, J. R. et al. Integrative detection and analysis of structural variation in cancer genomes. Nat. Genet. 50, 1388–1398 (2018).
Google Scholar
Barutcu, A. R. et al. RUNX1 contributes to higher-order chromatin organization and gene regulation in breast cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1859, 1389–1397 (2016).
Google Scholar
Harewood, L. et al. Hi-C as a tool for precise detection and characterisation of chromosomal rearrangements and copy number variation in human tumours. Genome Biol. 18, 125 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. The properties of genome conformation and spatial gene interaction and regulation networks of normal and malignant human cell types. PLoS One 8, e58793 (2013).
Google Scholar
Taberlay, P. C. et al. Three-dimensional disorganization of the cancer genome occurs coincident with long-range genetic and epigenetic alterations. Genome Res. 26, 719–731 (2016).
Google Scholar
Guo, Y. et al. CRISPR inversion of CTCF sites alters genome topology and enhancer/promoter function. Cell 162, 900–910 (2015).
Google Scholar
Akdemir, K. C. et al. Somatic mutation distributions in cancer genomes vary with three-dimensional chromatin structure. Nat. Genet. 52, 1178–1188 (2020).
Consortium, E. P. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
Google Scholar
Burton, J. N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119–1125 (2013).
Google Scholar
Engreitz, J. M., Agarwala, V. & Mirny, L. A. Three-dimensional genome architecture influences partner selection for chromosomal translocations in human disease. PLoS One 7, e44196 (2012).
Google Scholar
Naumova, N. et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342, 948–953 (2013).
Google Scholar
Seaman, L. et al. Nucleome analysis reveals structure-function relationships for colon cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 15, 821–830 (2017).
Google Scholar
Marcotte, R. et al. Functional genomic landscape of human breast cancer drivers, vulnerabilities, and resistance. Cell 164, 293–309 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ngoc, P. C. T. et al. Identification of novel lncRNAs regulated by the TAL1 complex in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 32, 2138–2151 (2018).
Google Scholar
Harenza, J. L. et al. Transcriptomic profiling of 39 commonly-used neuroblastoma cell lines. Sci. Data 4, 170033 (2017).
Google Scholar
Korbel, J. O. & Campbell, P. J. Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes. Cell 152, 1226–1236 (2013).
Google Scholar
Baca, S. C. et al. Punctuated evolution of prostate cancer genomes. Cell 153, 666–677 (2013).
Google Scholar
Cortes-Ciriano, I. et al. Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing. Nat. Genet. 52, 331–341 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stephens, P. J. et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144, 27–40 (2011).
Google Scholar
Forcato, M. et al. Comparison of computational methods for Hi-C data analysis. Nat. Methods 14, 679–685 (2017).
Google Scholar
Davidson, I. F. & Peters, J. M. Genome folding through loop extrusion by SMC complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 445–464 (2021).
Google Scholar
Veloza, L., Ribera-Cortada, I. & Campo, E. Mantle cell lymphoma pathology update in the 2016 WHO classification. Ann. Lymphoma 3, 2616–2695 (2019).
Canela, A. et al. Genome organization drives chromosome fragility. Cell 170, 507–521 e518 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
Google Scholar
Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Transcriptionally active HERV-H retrotransposons demarcate topologically associating domains in human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Genet. 51, 1380–1388 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dixon, J. R. et al. Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation. Nature 518, 331–336 (2015).
Google Scholar
Schuijers, J. et al. Transcriptional dysregulation of MYC reveals common enhancer-docking mechanism. Cell Rep. 23, 349–360 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shi, J. et al. Role of SWI/SNF in acute leukemia maintenance and enhancer-mediated Myc regulation. Genes Dev. 27, 2648–2662 (2013).
Google Scholar
Fulco, C. P. et al. Systematic mapping of functional enhancer-promoter connections with CRISPR interference. Science 354, 769–773 (2016).
Google Scholar
Beroukhim, R. et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 463, 899–905 (2010).
Google Scholar
Delgado, M. D. & Leon, J. Myc roles in hematopoiesis and leukemia. Genes Cancer 1, 605–616 (2010).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes. Nature 578, 112–121 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148, 908–921 (2012).
Google Scholar
Arber, D. A. et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 127, 2391–2405 (2016).
Google Scholar
Doyle, L. A. Sarcoma classification: an update based on the 2013 World Health Organization classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone. Cancer 120, 1763–1774 (2014).
Google Scholar
Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. W. et al. MYC drives a subset of high-risk pediatric neuroblastomas and is activated through mechanisms including enhancer hijacking and focal enhancer amplification. Cancer Discov. 8, 320–335 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fulco, C. P. et al. Activity-by-contact model of enhancer-promoter regulation from thousands of CRISPR perturbations. Nat. Genet. 51, 1664–1669 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhou, J. Sequence-based modeling of three-dimensional genome architecture from kilobase to chromosome scale. Nat. Genet. 54, 725–734 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lambert, S. A. et al. The human transcription factors. Cell 172, 650–665 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bradner, J. E., Hnisz, D. & Young, R. A. Transcriptional addiction in cancer. Cell 168, 629–643 (2017).
Google Scholar
Khurana, E. et al. Role of non-coding sequence variants in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 93–108 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lupianez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012–1025 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
Google Scholar
Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zuin, J. et al. Nonlinear control of transcription through enhancer-promoter interactions. Nature 604, 571–577 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).
Google Scholar
DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).
Google Scholar
Selvaraj, S., J, R. D., Bansal, V. & Ren, B. Whole-genome haplotype reconstruction using proximity-ligation and shotgun sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1111–1118 (2013).
Google Scholar
Edge, P., Bafna, V. & Bansal, V. HapCUT2: robust and accurate haplotype assembly for diverse sequencing technologies. Genome Res. 27, 801–812 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
Google Scholar
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).
Google Scholar
Haas, B. J. et al. Accuracy assessment of fusion transcript detection via read-mapping and de novo fusion transcript assembly-based methods. Genome Biol. 20, 213 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).
Imakaev, M. et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nat. Methods 9, 999–1003 (2012).
Google Scholar
Consortium, I. T. P.-C. A. o. W. G. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 578, 82–93 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nakamura, Y. et al. Targeting of super-enhancers and mutant BRAF can suppress growth of BRAF-mutant colon cancer cells via repression of MAPK signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 402, 100–109 (2017).
Google Scholar
Diaferia, G. R. et al. Dissection of transcriptional and cis-regulatory control of differentiation in human pancreatic cancer. EMBO J. 35, 595–617 (2016).
Google Scholar
Abraham, B. J. et al. Small genomic insertions form enhancers that misregulate oncogenes. Nat. Commun. 8, 14385 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kalender Atak, Z. et al. Identification of cis-regulatory mutations generating de novo edges in personalized cancer gene regulatory networks. Genome Med. 9, 80 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ryan, R. J. et al. Detection of enhancer-associated rearrangements reveals mechanisms of oncogene dysregulation in B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Discov. 5, 1058–1071 (2015).
Google Scholar
Perreault, A. A., Sprunger, D. M. & Venters, B. J. Epigenetic and transcriptional profiling of triple negative breast cancer. Sci. Data 6, 190033 (2019).
Google Scholar
Franco, H. L. et al. Enhancer transcription reveals subtype-specific gene expression programs controlling breast cancer pathogenesis. Genome Res. 28, 159–170 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. CDK7-dependent transcriptional addiction in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell 163, 174–186 (2015).
Google Scholar
Feld, C. et al. Combined cistrome and transcriptome analysis of SKI in AML cells identifies SKI as a co-repressor for RUNX1. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 3412–3428 (2018).
Google Scholar
Singh, A. A. et al. Optimized ChIP-seq method facilitates transcription factor profiling in human tumors. Life Sci. Alliance 2, e201800115 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, N. Q. et al. The non-coding variant rs1800734 enhances DCLK3 expression through long-range interaction and promotes colorectal cancer progression. Nat. Commun. 8, 14418 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wan, L. et al. ENL links histone acetylation to oncogenic gene expression in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature 543, 265–269 (2017).
Google Scholar
Saito, S. et al. Eradication of central nervous system leukemia of T-cell origin with a brain-permeable LSD1 inhibitor. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 1601–1611 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mansour, M. R. et al. Oncogene regulation. An oncogenic super-enhancer formed through somatic mutation of a noncoding intergenic element. Science 346, 1373–1377 (2014).
Google Scholar
Eliades, P. et al. High MITF expression is associated with super-enhancers and suppressed by CDK7 inhibition in melanoma. J. Invest. Dermatol. 138, 1582–1590 (2018).
Google Scholar
Boeva, V. et al. Heterogeneity of neuroblastoma cell identity defined by transcriptional circuitries. Nat. Genet. 49, 1408–1413 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cohen, A. J. et al. Hotspots of aberrant enhancer activity punctuate the colorectal cancer epigenome. Nat. Commun. 8, 14400 (2017).
Google Scholar
Valenciaga, A. et al. Transcriptional targeting of oncogene addiction in medullary thyroid cancer. JCI Insight 3, e122225 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, P. et al. Symbiotic macrophage-glioma cell interactions reveal synthetic lethality in PTEN-null glioma. Cancer Cell 35, 868–884 e866 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Google Scholar
Adrian Alexa, J. R. topGO: Enrichment analysis for gene ontology. R package version 2.48.0 https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.bioc.topGO (2022).