Global Plastics Outlook: Economic Drivers, Environmental Impacts and Policy Options (OECD, 2022).
Schneiderman, D. K. & Hillmyer, M. A. 50th anniversary perspective: there is a great future in sustainable polymers. Macromolecules 50, 3733–3749 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ostle, C. et al. The rise in ocean plastics evidenced from a 60-year time series. Nat. Commun. 10, 1622 (2019).
Google Scholar
Borrelle, S. B. et al. Predicted growth in plastic waste exceeds efforts to mitigate plastic pollution. Science 369, 1515–1518 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lau, W. W. Y. et al. Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution. Science 369, 1455–1461 (2020).
Google Scholar
Brahney, J., Hallerud, M., Heim, E., Hahnenberger, M. & Sukumaran, S. Plastic rain in protected areas of the United States. Science 368, 1257–1260 (2020).
Google Scholar
MacLeod, M., Arp, H. P. H., Tekman, M. B. & Jahnke, A. The global threat from plastic pollution. Science 373, 61–65 (2021).
Google Scholar
Santos, R. G., Machovsky-Capuska, G. E. & Andrades, R. Plastic ingestion as an evolutionary trap: toward a holistic understanding. Science 373, 56–60 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tamargo, A. et al. PET microplastics affect human gut microbiota communities during simulated gastrointestinal digestion, first evidence of plausible polymer biodegradation during human digestion. Sci. Rep. 12, 528 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bachmann, M. et al. Towards circular plastics within planetary boundaries. Nat. Sustain. 6, 599–610 (2023). Evaluation of various pathways for a circular plastics economy in view of nine planetary boundaries beyond GHG emissions.
Google Scholar
Carus, M., Dammer, L., Raschka, A. & Skoczinski, P. Renewable carbon: key to a sustainable and future‐oriented chemical and plastic industry: definition, strategy, measures and potential. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 10, 488–505 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pires da Mata Costa, L. et al. Capture and reuse of carbon dioxide (CO2) for a plastics circular economy: a review. Processes 9, 759 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bauer, F. et al. Plastics and climate change—breaking carbon lock-ins through three mitigation pathways. One Earth 5, 361–376 (2022). Potential risks and consequences of carbon lock-in at each stage of the plastics life cycle and their relationship with innovations and policy to change the plastic system.
Google Scholar
Spierling, S. et al. Bio-based plastics – a review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments. J. Clean. Prod. 185, 476–491 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cywar, R. M., Rorrer, N. A., Hoyt, C. B., Beckham, G. T. & Chen, E. Y. X. Bio-based polymers with performance-advantaged properties. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 83–103 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rosenboom, J.-G., Langer, R. & Traverso, G. Bioplastics for a circular economy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 117–137 (2022). Prospects of integrating bio-based plastics in a future circular economy, with a critical look at all the stages of the life cycle, as well as the current state of their market and policy implementation worldwide.
Google Scholar
Law, K. L. & Narayan, R. Reducing environmental plastic pollution by designing polymer materials for managed end-of-life. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 104–116 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jehanno, C. et al. Critical advances and future opportunities in upcycling commodity polymers. Nature 603, 803–814 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mangold, H. & von Vacano, B. The frontier of plastics recycling: rethinking waste as a resource for high‐value applications. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 223, 2100488 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jambeck, J. R. et al. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347, 768–771 (2015).
Google Scholar
Brooks, A. L., Wang, S. & Jambeck, J. R. The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat0131 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, C., Zhao, L., Lim, M. K., Chen, W.-Q. & Sutherland, J. W. Structure of the global plastic waste trade network and the impact of China’s import ban. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 153, 104591 (2020).
Google Scholar
van der Marel, E. R. Trading plastic waste in a global economy: soundly regulated by the Basel Convention? J. Environ. Law 34, 477–497 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lebreton, L. C. M. et al. River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nat. Commun. 8, 15611 (2017).
Google Scholar
Horejs, C. Solutions to plastic pollution. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 641–641 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rochman, C. M. et al. Classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nature 494, 169–171 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jung, Y. S. et al. Characterization and regulation of microplastic pollution for protecting planetary and human health. Environ. Pollut. 315, 120442 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fortman, D. J. et al. Approaches to sustainable and continually recyclable cross-linked polymers. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 11145–11159 (2018).
Google Scholar
Coates, G. W. & Getzler, Y. D. Y. L. Chemical recycling to monomer for an ideal, circular polymer economy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 501–516 (2020). Advances in chemical depolymerization to monomers from polymers to revalorize plastic waste.
Google Scholar
Vollmer, I. et al. Beyond mechanical recycling: giving new life to plastic waste. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 15402–15423 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ellis, L. D. et al. Chemical and biological catalysis for plastics recycling and upcycling. Nat. Catal. 4, 539–556 (2021). Challenges and opportunities for catalysis development in chemical and biological recycling.
Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO), Committee on Trade and Environment. WTO Informal Dialogue on Plastics Pollution and Environmentally Sustainable Plastics Trade. WT/CTE/W/250/Rev.2 (WTO, 2021).
United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) of the United Nations Environment Programme. End Plastic Pollution: Towards an International Legally Binding Instrument. UNEP/PP/OEWG/1/INF/1 (UNEA, 2022).
Stöfen-O’Brien, A. The prospects of an international treaty on plastic pollution. Int. J. Mar. Coast. Law 37, 727–740 (2022).
Google Scholar
Simon, N. et al. A binding global agreement to address the life cycle of plastics. Science 373, 43–47 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kirk, E. A. & Popattanachai, N. Marine plastics: fragmentation, effectiveness and legitimacy in international lawmaking. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 27, 222–233 (2018).
Google Scholar
Raubenheimer, K., McIlgorm, A. & Oral, N. Towards an improved international framework to govern the life cycle of plastics. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 27, 210–221 (2018).
Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) of the United Nations Environment Programme. Combating Marine Plastic Litter and Microplastics: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Relevant International, Regional and Subregional Governance Strategies and Approaches. UNEP/EA.3/INF/5 (UNEA, 2018).
Landrigan, P. J. et al. The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health. Ann. Glob. Health 89, 23 (2023).
Google Scholar
Geyer, R. in Plastic Waste and Recycling: Environmental Impact, Societal Issues, Prevention, and Solutions (ed. Letcher, T. M.) 13–32 (Academic, 2020).
Stubbins, A., Law, K. L., Muñoz, S. E., Bianchi, T. S. & Zhu, L. Plastics in the Earth system. Science 373, 51–55 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zheng, J. & Suh, S. Strategies to reduce the global carbon footprint of plastics. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 374–378 (2019). The effect of implementing decarbonized energy, reduced demand, high recycling and bio-based plastics in reducing the carbon footprint of plastics.
Google Scholar
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global Carbon Budget 2022. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 4811–4900 (2022).
Google Scholar
Breaking the Plastic Wave: A Comprehensive Assessment of Pathways Towards Stopping Ocean Plastic Pollution (The Pew Charitable Trusts and SYSTEMIQ, 2020).
The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the Future of Plastics (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2016).
The New Plastics Economy: Catalysing Action (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2017).
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A New Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe COM(2020) 98 final (European Commission, 2020).
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Closing the Loop – An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy COM(2015) 614 final (European Commission, 2015).
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy COM(2018) 28 final (European Commission, 2018).
Meys, R. et al. Achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emission plastics by a circular carbon economy. Science 374, 71–76 (2021). Life-cycle assessments of circular pathways for the plastics sector, focused on recycling, biomass and CCU, and aimed towards carbon-footprint reductions.
Google Scholar
Stegmann, P., Daioglou, V., Londo, M., van Vuuren, D. P. & Junginger, M. Plastic futures and their CO2 emissions. Nature 612, 272–276 (2022). Cumulative projections of plastic production and emissions towards 2100 and the effects of implementing circular mitigation strategies.
Google Scholar
Bank, M. S. & Hansson, S. V. The plastic cycle: a novel and holistic paradigm for the Anthropocene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 7177–7179 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhu, X. The plastic cycle – an unknown branch of the carbon cycle. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 1227 (2021).
Google Scholar
Global Waste Management Outlook (UNEP, 2015).
Zimmerman, J. B., Anastas, P. T., Erythropel, H. C. & Leitner, W. Designing for a green chemistry future. Science 367, 397–400 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sinha, V., Patel, M. R. & Patel, J. V. Pet waste management by chemical recycling: a review. J. Polym. Environ. 18, 8–25 (2008).
Google Scholar
Lopez, G., Artetxe, M., Amutio, M., Bilbao, J. & Olazar, M. Thermochemical routes for the valorization of waste polyolefinic plastics to produce fuels and chemicals. A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 73, 346–368 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rahimi, A. & García, J. M. Chemical recycling of waste plastics for new materials production. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0046 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lopez, G. et al. Recent advances in the gasification of waste plastics. A critical overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 576–596 (2018).
Google Scholar
Schyns, Z. O. G. & Shaver, M. P. Mechanical recycling of packaging plastics: a review. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 42, 2000415 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ghosh, K. & Jones, B. H. Roadmap to biodegradable plastics—current state and research needs. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9, 6170–6187 (2021). Analysis of current biodegradable plastics and description of future focus areas for development.
Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Fevre, M., Jones, G. O. & Waymouth, R. M. Catalysis as an enabling science for sustainable polymers. Chem. Rev. 118, 839–885 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Fridrich, B., de Santi, A., Elangovan, S. & Barta, K. Bright side of lignin depolymerization: toward new platform chemicals. Chem. Rev. 118, 614–678 (2018). Review on the catalytic processes to obtain chemicals and monomers from lignin.
Google Scholar
Grignard, B., Gennen, S., Jérôme, C., Kleij, A. W. & Detrembleur, C. Advances in the use of CO2 as a renewable feedstock for the synthesis of polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 4466–4514 (2019). Catalytic pathways for the chemical conversion of CO2 into polymers.
Google Scholar
O’Dea, R. M., Willie, J. A. & Epps, T. H. 100th anniversary of macromolecular science viewpoint: polymers from lignocellulosic biomass. Current challenges and future opportunities. ACS Macro Lett. 9, 476–493 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hepburn, C. et al. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature 575, 87–97 (2019).
Google Scholar
Smith, S. M. et al. The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal 1st edn (The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal, 2023).
Centi, G., Quadrelli, E. A. & Perathoner, S. Catalysis for CO2 conversion: a key technology for rapid introduction of renewable energy in the value chain of chemical industries. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1711–1731 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sternberg, A., Jens, C. M. & Bardow, A. Life cycle assessment of CO2-based C1-chemicals. Green Chem. 19, 2244–2259 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhong, J. et al. State of the art and perspectives in heterogeneous catalysis of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 1385–1413 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kaiser, S. & Bringezu, S. Use of carbon dioxide as raw material to close the carbon cycle for the German chemical and polymer industries. J. Clean. Prod. 271, 122775 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schirmeister, C. G. & Mülhaupt, R. Closing the carbon loop in the circular plastics economy. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 43, 2200247 (2022).
Google Scholar
Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tulus, V., Pérez-Ramírez, J. & Guillén-Gosálbez, G. Planetary metrics for the absolute environmental sustainability assessment of chemicals. Green Chem. 23, 9881–9893 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rockström, J. et al. Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature 619, 102–111 (2023).
Google Scholar
Raubenheimer, K. & Urho, N. Possible elements of a new global agreement to prevent plastic pollution. Nordic Council of Ministers https://www.nordicreport2020.com/ (2020).
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: EU Policy Framework on Biobased, Biodegradable and Compostable Plastics COM(2022) 682 final (European Commission, 2022).
Brizga, J., Hubacek, K. & Feng, K. The unintended side effects of bioplastics: carbon, land, and water footprints. One Earth 3, 45–53 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nicholson, S. R., Rorrer, N. A., Carpenter, A. C. & Beckham, G. T. Manufacturing energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with plastics consumption. Joule 5, 673–686 (2021).
Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. Five misperceptions surrounding the environmental impacts of single-use plastic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 14143–14151 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ragaert, K., Delva, L. & Van Geem, K. Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste. Waste Manage. 69, 24–58 (2017).
Google Scholar
Stram, B. N. Key challenges to expanding renewable energy. Energy Policy 96, 728–734 (2016).
Google Scholar
Posen, I. D., Jaramillo, P., Landis, A. E. & Griffin, W. M. Greenhouse gas mitigation for U.S. plastics production: energy first, feedstocks later. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 034024 (2017).
Google Scholar
Stockholm+50: A Healthy Planet for the Prosperity of All–Our Responsibility, Our Opportunity A/CONF.238/9 (United Nations, 2022).
Barrowclough, D., Birkbeck, C. D. & Christen, J. Global trade in plastics: insights from the first life-cycle trade database. UNCTAD Research Paper No. 53, UNCTAD/SER.RP/2020/12 (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2020).
Chiroleu-Assouline, M. & Fodha, M. From regressive pollution taxes to progressive environmental tax reforms. Eur. Econ. Rev. 69, 126–142 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kirk, E., Popattanachai, N., van der Marel, E. R. & Barnes, R. Research Handbook on Plastics Regulation: Law, Policy and the Environment (Edward Elgar, 2024).
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The European Green Deal COM(2019) 640 final (European Commission, 2019).
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) (European Commission, 2021).
Ayeleru, O. O. et al. Challenges of plastic waste generation and management in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Waste Manage. 110, 24–42 (2020).
Google Scholar
Velis, C. A. Circular economy and global secondary material supply chains. Waste Manag. Res. 33, 389–391 (2015).
Google Scholar
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1 (UNGA, 2015).
Bocken, N. M. P. & Short, S. W. in Handbook of the Circular Economy 250–265 (Edward Elgar, 2020).
Mederake, L. Without a debate on sufficiency, a circular plastics economy will remain an illusion. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 3, 1425–1439 (2023).
Google Scholar
Murakami, S., Oguchi, M., Tasaki, T., Daigo, I. & Hashimoto, S. Lifespan of commodities, part I. The creation of a database and its review. J. Ind. Ecol. 14, 598–612 (2010).
Google Scholar
Leal, J. M., Pompidou, S., Charbuillet, C. & Perry, N. Product recoverability: a review of assessment methods. Procedia CIRP 69, 710–715 (2018).
Google Scholar
Geyer, R., Jambec, J. R. & Law, K. L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv 3, e1700782 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fagnani, D. E. et al. 100th anniversary of macromolecular science viewpoint: redefining sustainable polymers. ACS Macro Lett. 10, 41–53 (2020).
Google Scholar
Haque, F. M. et al. Defining the macromolecules of tomorrow through synergistic sustainable polymer research. Chem. Rev. 122, 6322–6373 (2022).
Google Scholar
The Gazette of Meghalaya. The Meghalaya Prohibition of Manufacture, Sale, Use and Throwing of Low Density Plastic Bags Act, 2001 (Act No. 4 of 2001) (Meghalaya Legislative Assembly, 2001).
Regulation Gazette. Regulation 543 under Section 24 (d) of the Environmental Conservation Act (Act No. 73 of 1989). No. 7348 Vol. 443 (South Africa Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, 2002).
Gazette of Eritrean Laws: Proclamations and Legal Notices. Regulations to Prohibit the Production, Sale or Distribution of Plastic Bags in Eritrea (Legal Notice No. 63/2002). Vol. 11/2002 No. 7 (The Government of Eritrea, 2002).
Bangladesh Gazette. The Bangladesh Environment Conservation Act, 1995 Act No. 1 of 1995, Sec. 6a, as amended by Sec. 5 of Act 9 of 2002 (The Government of Bangladesh, 2002).
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment. L155/1 (European Commission, 2019).
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Potential options for elements towards an international legally binding instrument, based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full life cycle of plastics as called for by United Nations Environment Assembly resolution 5/14. UNEP/PP/INC.2/4 (UNEP, 2023).
United Nations. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Treaty Series, Vol. 2256, p. 119 (United Nations, 2001).
United Nations. Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Treaty Series, Vol. 1522, p. 3 (United Nations, 1987).
United States Congress. Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015. Public Law 114–114 (U.S. Congress, 2015).
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/2055 of 25 September 2023 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards synthetic polymer microparticle. L238/67 (European Commission, 2023).
ReShaping Plastics: Pathways to a Circular, Climate Neutral Plastics System in Europe (SYSTEMIQ, 2022).
Desalegn, G. & Tangl, A. Banning vs taxing, reviewing the potential opportunities and challenges of plastic products. Sustainability 14, 7189 (2022).
Google Scholar
Klenert, D. et al. Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 669–677 (2018).
Google Scholar
European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Sustainable Carbon Cycles. COM(2021) 800 (European Commission, 2021).
Bergsma, G., Broeren, M., Schep, E. & Warringa, G. Mandatory percentage of recycled or bio-based plastic in the European Union (CE Delft, 2022).
The White House. Executive Order 14081: Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy (The White House, 2022).
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Bold Goals for U.S. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing. Harnessing Research and Development to Further Societal Goals (The White House, 2023).
European Commission. Art. 8 of the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and Directive (EU) 2019/904, and repealing Directive 94/62/EC, 30 November 2022 (European Commission, 2022).
Watkins, E., Schweitzer, J.-P., Leinala, E. & Börkey, P. Policy approaches to incentivise sustainable plastic design. OECD Environment Working Papers 149. OECD Publishing https://doi.org/10.1787/233ac351-en (2019). Contextualized examples of policies designed to enhance the prospects of a sustainable plastic economy.
European Commission. Public procurement. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/public-procurement_en (European Commission, 2023).
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, United Kingdom. Evaluation of the Contracts for Difference Scheme. Phase 1: Allocation Rounds 1 & 2. Final Report (Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2019).
Skovgaard, J. & van Asselt, H. The politics of fossil fuel subsidies and their reform: Implications for climate change mitigation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 10, e581 (2019).
Google Scholar
Döhler, N., Wellenreuther, C. & Wolf, A. Market Dynamics of Biodegradable Bio-based Plastics: Projections and Linkages to European Policies (Hamburg Institute of International Economics, 2020).
Barrowclough, D. & Birkbeck, C. Transforming the global plastics economy: the role of economic policies in the global governance of plastic pollution. Soc. Sci. 11, 26 (2022).
Google Scholar
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Decision 1/CMA.3 Glasgow Climate Pact. Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement on its third session, held in Glasgow from 31 October to 13 November 2021. FCCC/PA/CMA/2021/10/Add.1 (United Nations, 2021).
World Trade Organization. Ministerial Statement on Fossil Fuel Subsidies. WT/MIN(21)/9/Rev.2 (World Trade Organization, 2022).
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive (EU) 2023/959 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union and Decision (EU) 2015/1814 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading system. L130/134 (European Commission, 2023).
The Future of Petrochemicals: Towards More Sustainable Plastics and Fertilisers (IEA, 2018). A highlight of the petrochemical sector becoming the largest driver of global oil demand and its continuous investments in the production of fossil-fuel-based plastics.
Bauer, F. & Fontenit, G. Plastic dinosaurs – digging deep into the accelerating carbon lock-in of plastics. Energy Policy 156, 112418 (2021).
Google Scholar
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). CEN/TC 411 – Bio-based products. https://standards.cencenelec.eu/dyn/www/f?p=CEN:6 (CEN, 2021).
United Nations. Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal. Treaty Series, Vol. 1673, p. 57 (United Nations, 1989).
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Technical guidelines on the environmentally sound management of plastic wastes. UNEP/CHW.16/6/Add.3/Rev.1 (UNEP, 2023).
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive (EU) 2018/852 of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste. L150/141 (European Commission, 2018).
Raubenheimer, K. & Urho, N. Rethinking global governance of plastics – the role of industry. Mar. Policy 113, 103802 (2020).
Google Scholar
Extended Producer Responsibility: A Necessary Part of the Solution to Packaging Waste and Pollution (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2021).
Dalhammar, C. in Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Law Ch. VI.16 (ed. Faure, M.) (2018).
Sachs, N. Planning the funeral at the birth: extended producer responsibility in the European Union and the United States. Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 30, 51 (2006).
Extended Producer Responsibility (OECD, 2016).
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Revised Draft Practical manual on Extended Producer Responsibility. UNEP/CHW.14/5/Add.1 (UNEP, 2019).
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Report of the Conference of the Parties to the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal on the work of its fourteenth meeting. UNEP/CHW.14/28 (UNEP, 2019).
WRAP and the UK Plastics Pact. A Roadmap to 2025: The UK Plastics Pact https://wrap.org.uk/resources/guide/roadmap-2025-uk-plastics-pact (WRAP, 2022).
Colorado Department of Revenue. Plastic recycling investment tax credit. https://tax.colorado.gov/sites/tax/files/Income56.pdf (1989).
Larrain, M., Billen, P. & Van Passel, S. The effect of plastic packaging recycling policy interventions as a complement to extended producer responsibility schemes: a partial equilibrium model. Waste Manage. 153, 355–366 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gao, W., Hundertmark, T., Pais, G., Ryba, A., & Wallach, J. Addressing the challenges of plastic waste: circularity and leakage. McKinsey https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/chemicals/our-insights/addressing-the-challenges-of-plastic-waste-circularity-and-leakage#/ (2022).
Gall, M., Wiener, M., Chagas de Oliveira, C., Lang, R. W. & Hansen, E. G. Building a circular plastics economy with informal waste pickers: recyclate quality, business model, and societal impacts. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 156, 104685 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alaranta, J. & Turunen, T. How to reach a safe circular economy?—Perspectives on reconciling the waste, product and chemicals regulation. J. Environ. Law 33, 113–136 (2021).
Google Scholar
European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the circular economy package: options to address the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation. COM(2018) 32 final. (European Commission, 2018).
Schwarz, A. E., Lensen, S. M. C., Langeveld, E., Parker, L. A. & Urbanus, J. H. Plastics in the global environment assessed through material flow analysis, degradation and environmental transportation. Sci. Total Environ. 875, 162644 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E. & Purnell, P. An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. J. Hazard. Mater. 344, 179–199 (2018).
Google Scholar
European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment. COM(2020) 667 final (European Commission, 2020).
United Nations. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Treaty Series, Vol. 2226, p. 208 (United Nations, 2000).
Basel Convention, Rotterdam Convention, and Stockholm Convention. Joint clearing house mechanism for information exchange: revised draft strategy. UNEP/CHW.13/1-UNEP/FAO/RC/COP.8/1-UNEP/POPS/COP.8/1 (Basel Convention, Rotterdam Convention, and Stockholm Convention, 2017).
European Commission. Proposal for an EU Regulation on Ecodesign for Sustainable Products. COM(2022)142 final (European Commission, 2022).
CO2 Emissions in 2022 https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022 (IEA, 2023).