Rees, M. J. Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 106–108 solar masses in nearby galaxies. Nature 333, 523–528 (1988).
Bloom, J. S. et al. A possible relativistic jetted outburst from a massive black hole fed by a tidally disrupted star. Science 333, 203–206 (2011).
Google Scholar
Burrows, D. N. et al. Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole. Nature 476, 421–424 (2011).
Google Scholar
Levan, A. J. et al. An extremely luminous panchromatic outburst from the nucleus of a distant galaxy. Science 333, 199–202 (2011).
Google Scholar
Zauderer, B. A. et al. Birth of a relativistic outflow in the unusual γ-ray transient Swift J164449.3+573451. Nature 476, 425–428 (2011).
Google Scholar
Cenko, S. B. et al. Swift J2058.4+0516: discovery of a possible second relativistic tidal disruption flare? Astrophys. J. 753, 77 (2012).
Brown, G. C. et al. Swift J1112.2-8238: a candidate relativistic tidal disruption flare. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 4297–4306 (2015).
Google Scholar
Pasham, D. R. et al. A multiwavelength study of the relativistic tidal disruption candidate Swift J2058.4+0516 at late times. Astrophys. J. 805, 68 (2015).
Yuan, Q., Wang, Q. D., Lei, W.-H., Gao, H. & Zhang, B. Catching jetted tidal disruption events early in millimetre. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 3375–3384 (2016).
Google Scholar
Graham, M. J. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: science objectives. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 078001 (2019).
Sun, H., Zhang, B. & Li, Z. Extragalactic high-energy transients: event rate densities and luminosity functions. Astrophys. J. 812, 33 (2015).
Andreoni, I. et al. Fast-transient searches in real time with ZTFReST: identification of three optically discovered gamma-ray burst afterglows and new constraints on the kilonova rate. Astrophys. J. 918, 63 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pasham, D., Gendreau, K., Arzoumanian, Z. & Cenko, B. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: NICER X-ray detection. GCN Circ. 31601, 1 (2022).
Perley, D. A. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: VLA radio detection. GCN Circ. 31592, 1 (2022).
Perley, D. A., Ho, A. Y. Q., Petitpas, G. & Keating, G. ZTF22aaajecb/AT2022cmc: submillimeter array detection. GCN Circ. 31627, 1 (2022).
Planck Collaboration. Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); erratum 652, C4 (2021).
Tanvir, N. R. et al. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: VLT/X-shooter redshift. GCN Circ. 31602, 1 (2022).
Gal-Yam, A. Observational and physical classification of supernovae. In Handbook of Supernovae (eds. Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P.) 195–237 (Springer, 2017).
Lu, W. & Bonnerot, C. Self-intersection of the fallback stream in tidal disruption events. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, 686–707 (2020).
Google Scholar
Blandford, R. D. & Znajek, R. L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 179, 433–456 (1977).
Pasham, D. et al. High-cadence NICER X-ray observations of AT2022cmc/ZTF22aaajecpc: flux variability and spectral evolution suggest it could be a relativistic tidal disruption event. Astron. Telegr. 15232, 1 (2022).
Yao, Y., Pasham, D. R. & Gendreau, K. C. NuSTAR observation of AT2022cmc, and joint spectral fitting with NICER. Astron. Telegr. 15230, 1 (2022).
Tchekhovskoy, A., Metzger, B. D., Giannios, D. & Kelley, L. Z. Swift J1644+57 gone MAD: the case for dynamically important magnetic flux threading the black hole in a jetted tidal disruption event. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, 2744–2760 (2014).
Kumar, P. & Zhang, B. The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets. Phys. Reports 561, 1–109 (2015).
Dai, L., McKinney, J. C., Roth, N., Ramirez-Ruiz, E. & Miller, M. C. A unified model for tidal disruption events. Astrophys. J. Lett. 859, L20 (2018).
Bonnerot, C., Lu, W. & Hopkins, P. F. First light from tidal disruption events. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 504, 4885–4905 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mattila, S. et al. A dust-enshrouded tidal disruption event with a resolved radio jet in a galaxy merger. Science 361, 482–485 (2018).
Google Scholar
Stone, N. C. et al. Rates of stellar tidal disruption. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 35 (2020).
De Colle, F. & Lu, W. Jets from tidal disruption events. New Astron. Rev. 89, 101538 (2020).
Alexander, K. D., van Velzen, S., Horesh, A. & Zauderer, B. A. Radio properties of tidal disruption events. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 81 (2020).
Hammerstein, E. et al. The final season reimagined: 30 tidal disruption events from the ZTF-I Survey. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.01461 (2022).
Aasi, J. et al. Advanced LIGO. Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 074001 (2015).
Acernese, F. et al. Advanced Virgo. Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 024001 (2015).
Aartsen, M. et al. The IceCube neutrino observatory: instrumentation and online systems. J. Instrum. 12, P03012–P03012 (2017).
Bellm, E. C. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: system overview, performance, and first results. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 018002 (2019).
Ivezić, Ž. et al. LSST: from science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products. Astrophys. J. 873, 111 (2019).
Andreoni, I. & Coughlin, M. growth-astro/ztfrest: ztfrest. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6827348 (2022).
Yao, Y. et al. ZTF early observations of type Ia supernovae. I. Properties of the 2018 sample. Astrophys. J. 886, 152 (2019).
Google Scholar
Andreoni, I. ZTF Transient Discovery Report for 2022-02-14. Report No. 2022-397 (Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2022); https://wis-tns.org/object/2022cmc/discovery-cert
Metzger, B. D. Kilonovae. Living Rev. Relativ. 23, 1 (2019).
Google Scholar
Coulter, D. A. et al. Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the optical counterpart to a gravitational wave source. Science 358, 1556–1558 (2017).
Google Scholar
Abbott, B. P. et al. GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
Google Scholar
Prentice, S. J. et al. The Cow: discovery of a luminous, hot, and rapidly evolving transient. Astrophys. J. Lett. 865, L3 (2018).
Perley, D. A. et al. The fast, luminous ultraviolet transient AT2018cow: extreme supernova, or disruption of a star by an intermediate-mass black hole? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 1031–1049 (2019).
Google Scholar
Margutti, R. et al. An embedded X-ray source shines through the aspherical AT2018cow: revealing the inner workings of the most luminous fast-evolving optical transients. Astrophys. J. 872, 18 (2019).
Google Scholar
Coppejans, D. L. et al. A mildly relativistic outflow from the energetic, fast-rising blue optical transient CSS161010 in a dwarf galaxy. Astrophys. J. Lett. 895, L23 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. The Koala: a fast blue optical transient with luminous radio emission from a starburst dwarf galaxy at z = 0.27. Astrophys. J. 895, 49 (2020).
Google Scholar
Perley, D. A. et al. Real-time discovery of AT2020xnd: a fast, luminous ultraviolet transient with minimal radioactive ejecta. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 5138–5147 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yao, Y. et al. The X-ray and radio loud fast blue optical transient AT2020mrf: implications for an emerging class of engine-driven massive star explosions. Astrophys. J. 934, 104 (2022).
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. AT2018cow: a luminous millimeter transient. Astrophys. J. 871, 73 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. Luminous millimeter, radio, and X-ray emission from ZTF 20acigmel (AT 2020xnd). Astrophys. J. 932, 116 (2022).
Quataert, E. & Kasen, D. Swift 1644+57: the longest gamma-ray burst? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, L1–L5 (2012).
Sheth, K. et al. Millimeter observations of GRB 030329: continued evidence for a two-component jet. Astrophys. J. 595, L33–L36 (2003).
Laskar, T. et al. First ALMA light curve constrains refreshed reverse shocks and jet magnetization in GRB 161219B. Astrophys. J. 862, 94 (2018).
Laskar, T. et al. A reverse shock in GRB 181201A. Astrophys. J. 884, 121 (2019).
Google Scholar
Perley, D. A. et al. The afterglow of GRB 130427A from 1 to 1016 GHz. Astrophys. J. 781, 37 (2014).
de Ugarte Postigo, A. et al. Pre-ALMA observations of GRBs in the mm/submm range. Astron. Astrophys. 538, A44 (2012).
Kulkarni, S. R. et al. Radio emission from the unusual supernova 1998bw and its association with the γ-ray burst of 25 April 1998. Nature 395, 663–669 (1998).
Google Scholar
Perley, D. A., Schulze, S. & de Ugarte Postigo, A. GRB 171205A: ALMA observations. GCN Circ. 22252, 1 (2017).
Weiler, K. W. et al. Long-term radio monitoring of SN 1993J. Astrophys. J. 671, 1959–1980 (2007).
Google Scholar
Maeda, K. et al. The final months of massive star evolution from the circumstellar environment around SN Ic 2020oi. Astrophys. J. 918, 34 (2021).
Horesh, A. et al. An early and comprehensive millimetre and centimetre wave and X-ray study of SN 2011dh: a non-equipartition blast wave expanding into a massive stellar wind. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 1258–1267 (2013).
Corsi, A. et al. A multi-wavelength investigation of the radio-loud supernova PTF11qcj and its circumstellar environment. Astrophys. J. 782, 42 (2014).
Soderberg, A. M. et al. A relativistic type Ibc supernova without a detected γ-ray burst. Nature 463, 513–515 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kann, D. A., Klose, S. & Zeh, A. Signatures of extragalactic dust in pre-Swift GRB afterglows. Astrophys. J. 641, 993–1009 (2006).
Google Scholar
Kann, D. A. et al. The afterglows of Swift-era gamma-ray bursts. I. Comparing pre-Swift and Swift-era long/soft (type II) GRB optical afterglows. Astrophys. J. 720, 1513–1558 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kann, D. A. et al. The afterglows of Swift-era gamma-ray bursts. II. Type I GRB versus type II GRB optical afterglows. Astrophys. J. 734, 96 (2011).
Strubbe, L. E. & Quataert, E. Optical flares from the tidal disruption of stars by massive black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 400, 2070–2084 (2009).
Shiokawa, H., Krolik, J. H., Cheng, R. M., Piran, T. & Noble, S. C. General relativistic hydrodynamic simulation of accretion flow from a stellar tidal disruption. Astrophys. J. 804, 85 (2015).
Hayasaki, K., Stone, N. & Loeb, A. Circularization of tidally disrupted stars around spinning supermassive black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 3760–3780 (2016).
Bonnerot, C., Rossi, E. M., Lodato, G. & Price, D. J. Disc formation from tidal disruptions of stars on eccentric orbits by Schwarzschild black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 2253–2266 (2016).
Metzger, B. D. & Stone, N. C. A bright year for tidal disruptions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 948–966 (2016).
Google Scholar
Metzger, B. D., Giannios, D. & Mimica, P. Afterglow model for the radio emission from the jetted tidal disruption candidate Swift J1644+57. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 420, 3528–3537 (2012).
Tchekhovskoy, A., Narayan, R. & McKinney, J. C. Black hole spin and the radio loud/quiet dichotomy of active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 711, 50–63 (2010).
Law-Smith, J. A. P., Coulter, D. A., Guillochon, J., Mockler, B. & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. Stellar tidal disruption events with abundances and realistic structures (STARS): library of fallback rates. Astrophys. J. 905, 141 (2020).
Jiang, Y.-F., Stone, J. M. & Davis, S. W. Super-Eddington accretion disks around supermassive black holes. Astrophys. J. 880, 67 (2019).
Google Scholar
de Ugarte Postigo, A. et al. The distribution of equivalent widths in long GRB afterglow spectra. Astron. Astrophys. 548, A11 (2012).
Bloom, J. S., Kulkarni, S. R. & Djorgovski, S. G. The observed offset distribution of gamma-ray bursts from their host galaxies: a robust clue to the nature of the Progenitors. Astron. J. 123, 1111–1148 (2002).
Blanchard, P. K., Berger, E. & Fong, W.-F. The offset and host light distributions of long gamma-ray bursts: a new view from HST observations of Swift bursts. Astrophys. J. 817, 144 (2016).
Burrows, D. N. et al. The Swift X-Ray Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 120, 165–195 (2005).
Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C. & Speagle, J. S. Stellar population inference with Prospector. Astrophys. J. Supp. Ser. 254, 22 (2021).
Google Scholar
Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E. & White, M. The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling. I. The relevance of uncertain aspects of stellar evolution and the initial mass function to the derived physical properties of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 699, 486–506 (2009).
Foreman-Mackey, D., Sick, J. & Johnson, B. python-fsps: Python bindings to FSPS (v0.1.1). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12157 (2014).
Byler, N., Dalcanton, J. J., Conroy, C. & Johnson, B. D. Nebular continuum and line emission in stellar population synthesis models. Astrophys. J. 840, 44 (2017).
Chabrier, G. Galactic stellar and substellar initial mass function. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 115, 763–795 (2003).
Calzetti, D. et al. The dust content and opacity of actively star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 533, 682–695 (2000).
Schulze, S. et al. The Palomar Transient Factory Core-collapse Supernova Host-galaxy Sample. I. Host-galaxy distribution functions and environment dependence of core-collapse supernovae. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 255, 29 (2021).
Google Scholar
McConnell, N. J. & Ma, C.-P. Revisiting the scaling relations of black hole masses and host galaxy properties. Astrophys. J. 764, 184 (2013).
Kesden, M. Tidal-disruption rate of stars by spinning supermassive black holes. Phys. Rev. D 85, 024037 (2012).
Cummings, J. R. et al. GRB 110328A: Swift detection of a burst. GCN Circ. 11823, 1 (2011).
Benson, B. A. et al. SPT-3G: a next-generation cosmic microwave background polarization experiment on the South Pole telescope. In Proc. SPIE 9153: Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy VII (eds Holland, W. S. & Zmuidzinas, J.) 91531P (SPIE, 2014).
Abazajian, K. et al. CMB-S4 science case, reference design, and project plan. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04473 (2019).
Guns, S. et al. Detection of galactic and extragalactic millimeter-wavelength transient sources with SPT-3G. Astrophys. J. 916, 98 (2021).
Eftekhari, T. et al. Extragalactic millimeter transients in the era of next-generation CMB surveys. Astrophys. J. 935, 16 (2022).
Feindt, U. et al. simsurvey: estimating transient discovery rates for the Zwicky Transient Facility. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2019, 005 (2019).
Google Scholar
Andreoni, I. et al. Constraining the kilonova rate with Zwicky Transient Facility searches independent of gravitational wave and short gamma-ray burst triggers. Astrophys. J. 904, 155 (2020).
Google Scholar
Buchner, J. et al. X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue. Astron. Astrophys. 564, A125 (2014).
Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P. & Bridges, M. Multinest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1601–1614 (2009).
Feroz, F. & Hobson, M. P. Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 384, 449 (2008).
Bellm, E. C. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: surveys and scheduler. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 068003 (2019).
Dekany, R. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: observing system. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 132, 038001 (2020).
Masci, F. J. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: data processing, products, and archive. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 018003 (2019).
Steele, I. A. et al. The Liverpool Telescope: performance and first results. In Proc. SPIE 5489: Ground-based Telescopes (ed. Oschmann, J. M. Jr.) 679-692 (SPIE, 2004).
Perley, R. A., Chandler, C. J., Butler, B. J. & Wrobel, J. M. The Expanded Very Large Array: a new telescope for new science. Astrophys. J. Lett. 739, L1 (2011).
Holland, W. S. et al. SCUBA-2: the 10 000 pixel bolometer camera on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 2513–2533 (2013).
Currie, M. J. et al. Starlink Software in 2013. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII (eds Manset, N. & Forshay, P.) 391–394 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2014).
Chapin, E. L. et al. SCUBA-2: iterative map-making with the Sub-Millimetre User Reduction Facility. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 2545–2573 (2013).
Mairs, S. et al. A decade of SCUBA-2: a comprehensive guide to calibrating 450 μm and 850 μm continuum data at the JCMT. Astron. J. 162, 191 (2021).
Smith, I. A., Perley, D. A. & Tanvir, N. R. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: JCMT SCUBA-2 sub-mm observations. GCN Circ. 31654 (2022).
McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W. & Golap, K. CASA architecture and applications. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI (eds Shaw, R. A. et al.) 127 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2007).
Maity, B. & Chandra, P. 1000 days of the lowest-frequency emission from the low-luminosity GRB 171205A. Astrophys. J. 907, 60 (2021).
Google Scholar
McCully, C. & Tewes, M. Astro-SCRAPPY: Speedy Cosmic Ray Annihilation Package in Python. Github https://github.com/astropy/astroscrappy (2019).
Bertin, E. SWarp: resampling and co-adding FITS images together. Astrophys. Source Code Library http://ascl.net/1010.068 (2010).
Chambers, K. C. et al. The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05560 (2016).
Flaugher, B. et al. The Dark Energy Camera. Astron. J. 150, 150 (2015).
Valdes, F., Gruendl, R. & DES Project. The DECam Community Pipeline. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII (eds Manset, N. & Forshay, P.) 379–382 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2014).
Rest, A. et al. Cosmological constraints from measurements of type Ia supernovae discovered during the first 1.5 yr of the Pan-STARRS1 Survey. Astrophys. J. 795, 44 (2014).
Xavier Prochaska, J. et al. pypeit/Pypeit: release 1.0.0. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/record/3743493 (2020).
Cenko, S. B. et al. The Automated Palomar 60 Inch Telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 118, 1396–1406 (2006).
Blagorodnova, N. et al. The SED Machine: a robotic spectrograph for fast transient classification. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 130, 035003 (2018).
Rigault, M. et al. Fully automated integral field spectrograph pipeline for the SEDMachine: pysedm. Astron. Astrophys. 627, A115 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fremling, C. et al. PTF12os and iPTF13bvn. Astron. Astrophys. 593, A68 (2016).
Ahn, C. P. et al. The Tenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: first spectroscopic data from the SDSS-III Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 211, 17 (2014).
Tonry, J. L. et al. ATLAS: a high-cadence all-sky survey system. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 130, 064505 (2018).
Smith, K. W. et al. Design and operation of the ATLAS transient science server. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 132, 085002 (2020).
Vernet, J. et al. X-shooter, the new wide band intermediate resolution spectrograph at the ESO Very Large Telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 536, A105 (2011).
Modigliani, A. et al. The X-shooter pipeline. In Proc. SPIE 7737: Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III (eds Silva, D. R. et al.) 773728 (SPIE, 2010).
Selsing, J. et al. The X-shooter GRB afterglow legacy sample (XS-GRB). Astron. Astrophys. 623, A92 (2019).
Google Scholar
Garzón, F. et al. EMIR: the GTC NIR multi-object imager-spectrograph. In Proc. SPIE 6269: Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy (eds McLean, I. S. & Iye, M.) 626918 (SPIE, 2006).
Kann, D. A. et al. ZTF22aaajecp/AT 2022cmc: CAHA 2.2m/CAFOS detection, luminous transient. GCN Circ. 31626, 1 (2022).
Prochaska, J. et al. PypeIt: the Python spectroscopic data reduction pipeline. J. Open Source Softw. 5, 2308 (2020).
Lundquist, M. J., Alvarez, C. A. & O’Meara, J. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: Keck DEIMOS redshift. GCN Circ. 31612, 1 (2022).
Perley, D. A. Fully automated reduction of longslit spectroscopy with the Low Resolution Imaging Spectrometer at the Keck Observatory. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 084503 (2019).
Labrie, K., Cardenes, R., Anderson, K., Simpson, C. & Turner, J. E. H. DRAGONS: one pipeline to rule them all. In Proc. SPIE 522: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII (eds Ballester, P. et al.) 583–586 (SPIE, 2020).
Ahumada, T. et al. ZTF22aaajecp/AT2022cmc: GMOS-N spectroscopy. GCN Circ. 31595, 1 (2022).
Roming, P. W. A. et al. The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 120, 95–142 (2005).
Cash, W. Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio. Astrophys. J. 228, 939–947 (1979).
Gendreau, K. C. et al. The Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER): design and development. In Proc. SPIE 9905: Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray (eds den Herder, J.-W. A. et al.) 99051H (SPIE, 2016).
Pasham, D. R. et al. The birth of a relativistic jet following the disruption of a star by a cosmological black hole. Nat. Astron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01820-x (2022).
Remillard, R. A. et al. An empirical background model for the NICER X-Ray Timing Instrument. Astron. J. 163, 130 (2022).
Google Scholar
HI4PI Collaboration. HI4PI: a full-sky H i survey based on EBHIS and GASS. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A116 (2016).
Wiersema, K. et al. Polarimetry of the transient relativistic jet of GRB 110328/Swift J164449.3+573451. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 1942–1948 (2012).
Planck Collaboration. Planck 2013 results. XI. All-sky model of thermal dust emission. Astron. Astrophys. 571, A11 (2014).
Eftekhari, T., Berger, E., Zauderer, B. A., Margutti, R. & Alexander, K. D. Radio monitoring of the tidal disruption event Swift J164449.3+573451. III. Late-time jet energetics and a deviation from equipartition. Astrophys. J. 854, 86 (2018).
Fremling, C. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. I. Spectroscopic classification and the redshift completeness of local galaxy catalogs. Astrophys. J. 895, 32 (2020).
Google Scholar
Perley, D. A. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. II. A public statistical sample for exploring supernova demographics. Astrophys. J. 904, 35 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. The photometric and spectroscopic evolution of rapidly evolving extragalactic transients in ZTF. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08811 (2021).
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. Cosmological fast optical transients with the Zwicky Transient Facility: a search for dirty fireballs. Astrophys. J. 938, 85 (2022).
Cenko, S. B. et al. iPTF14yb: the first discovery of a gamma-ray burst afterglow independent of a high-energy trigger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 803, L24 (2015).
Cowperthwaite, P. S. et al. The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. II. UV, optical, and near-infrared light curves and comparison to kilonova models. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L17 (2017).
Kasliwal, M. M. et al. Illuminating gravitational waves: a concordant picture of photons from a neutron star merger. Science 358, 1559–1565 (2017).
Google Scholar
Drout, M. R. et al. Light curves of the neutron star merger GW170817/SSS17a: implications for r-process nucleosynthesis. Science 358, 1570–1574 (2017).
Google Scholar
Villar, V. A., Berger, E., Metzger, B. D. & Guillochon, J. Theoretical models of optical transients. I. A broad exploration of the duration–luminosity phase space. Astrophys. J. 849, 70 (2017).