Strange India All Strange Things About India and world


  • 1.

    Lens, S. M. A. & Medema, R. H. Cytokinesis defects and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19, 32–45 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Fujiwara, T. et al. Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells. Nature 437, 1043–1047 (2005).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Ganem, N. J., Godinho, S. A. & Pellman, D. A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature 460, 278–282 (2009).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Thompson, D. A., Desai, M. M. & Murray, A. W. Ploidy controls the success of mutators and nature of mutations during budding yeast evolution. Curr. Biol. 16, 1581–1590 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Dewhurst, S. M. et al. Tolerance of whole-genome doubling propagates chromosomal instability and accelerates cancer genome evolution. Cancer Discov. 4, 175–185 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    López, S. et al. Interplay between whole-genome doubling and the accumulation of deleterious alterations in cancer evolution. Nat. Genet. 52, 283–293 (2020).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Selmecki, A. M. et al. Polyploidy can drive rapid adaptation in yeast. Nature 519, 349–352 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Bielski, C. M. et al. Genome doubling shapes the evolution and prognosis of advanced cancers. Nat. Genet. 50, 1189–1195 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Ganem, N. J. et al. Cytokinesis failure triggers hippo tumor suppressor pathway activation. Cell 158, 833–848 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Senovilla, L. et al. An immunosurveillance mechanism controls cancer cell ploidy. Science 337, 1678–1684 (2012).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Andreassen, P. R., Lohez, O. D., Lacroix, F. B. & Margolis, R. L. Tetraploid state induces p53-dependent arrest of nontransformed mammalian cells in G1. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1315–1328 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Ben-David, U. & Amon, A. Context is everything: aneuploidy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 44–62 (2019). 10

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Storchová, Z. et al. Genome-wide genetic analysis of polyploidy in yeast. Nature 443, 541–547 (2006).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Lin, H. et al. Polyploids require Bik1 for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1173–1184 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Carter, S. L. et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 413–421 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Zack, T. I. et al. Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy number alteration. Nat. Genet. 45, 1134–1140 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Antao, N. V., Marcet-Ortega, M., Cifani, P., Kentsis, A. & Foley, E. A. A cancer-associated missense mutation in PP2A-Aα increases centrosome clustering during mitosis. iScience 19, 74–82 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Maruvka, Y. E. et al. Analysis of somatic microsatellite indels identifies driver events in human tumors. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 951–959 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Taylor, A. M. et al. Genomic and functional approaches to understanding cancer aneuploidy. Cancer Cell 33, 676–689 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Davoli, T., Uno, H., Wooten, E. C. & Elledge, S. J. Tumor aneuploidy correlates with markers of immune evasion and with reduced response to immunotherapy. Science 355, eaaf8399 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Broad, D. DepMap Achilles 18Q3 Public https://depmap.org/portal/ (2018).

  • 22.

    Godinho, S. A. et al. Oncogene-like induction of cellular invasion from centrosome amplification. Nature 510, 167–171 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Musacchio, A. The molecular biology of spindle assembly checkpoint signaling dynamics. Curr. Biol. 25, R1002–R1018 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Yang, Z., Lončarek, J., Khodjakov, A. & Rieder, C. L. Extra centrosomes and/or chromosomes prolong mitosis in human cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 748–751 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Jemaà, M. et al. Whole-genome duplication increases tumor cell sensitivity to MPS1 inhibition. Oncotarget 7, 885–901 (2016).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Wangsa, D. et al. Near-tetraploid cancer cells show chromosome instability triggered by replication stress and exhibit enhanced invasiveness. FASEB J. 32, 3502–3517 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Zheng, L. et al. Polyploid cells rewire DNA damage response networks to overcome replication stress-induced barriers for tumour progression. Nat. Commun. 3, 815 (2012).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Santaguida, S. & Amon, A. Short- and long-term effects of chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 473–485 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Stumpff, J., von Dassow, G., Wagenbach, M., Asbury, C. & Wordeman, L. The kinesin-8 motor Kif18A suppresses kinetochore movements to control mitotic chromosome alignment. Dev. Cell 14, 252–262 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Stumpff, J., Wagenbach, M., Franck, A., Asbury, C. L. & Wordeman, L. Kif18A and chromokinesins confine centromere movements via microtubule growth suppression and spatial control of kinetochore tension. Dev. Cell 22, 1017–1029 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Fonseca, C. L. et al. Mitotic chromosome alignment ensures mitotic fidelity by promoting interchromosomal compaction during anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 218, 1148–1163 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Mayr, M. I. et al. The human kinesin Kif18A is a motile microtubule depolymerase essential for chromosome congression. Curr. Biol. 17, 488–498 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Czechanski, A. et al. Kif18a is specifically required for mitotic progression during germ line development. Dev. Biol. 402, 253–262 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Hatch, E. M., Fischer, A. H., Deerinck, T. J. & Hetzer, M. W. Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei. Cell 154, 47–60 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Mackenzie, K. J. et al. cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity. Nature 548, 461–465 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Harding, S. M. et al. Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei. Nature 548, 466–470 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Zhang, C.-Z. et al. Chromothripsis from DNA damage in micronuclei. Nature 522, 179–184 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Janssen, L. M. E. et al. Loss of Kif18A results in spindle assembly checkpoint activation at microtubule-attached kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 28, 2685–2696 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Edzuka, T. & Goshima, G. Drosophila kinesin-8 stabilizes the kinetochore-microtubule interaction. J. Cell Biol. 218, 474–488 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Cohen-Sharir, Y. et al. Aneuploidy renders cancer cells vulnerable to mitotic checkpoint inhibition. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03114-6 (2021).

  • 41.

    Marquis, C. et al. Chromosomally unstable tumor cells specifically require KIF18A for proliferation. Nat. Comm. (in the press).

  • 42.

    Zhu, H. et al. Targeted deletion of Kif18a protects from colitis-associated colorectal (CAC) tumors in mice through impairing Akt phosphorylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 438, 97–102 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Zhang, C. et al. Kif18A is involved in human breast carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 31, 1676–1684 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Ellrott, K. et al. Scalable open science approach for mutation calling of tumor exomes using multiple genomic pipelines. Cell Syst. 6, 271–281 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Knijnenburg, T. A. et al. Genomic and molecular landscape of DNA damage repair deficiency across The Cancer Genome Atlas. Cell Rep. 23, 239–254 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Bailey, M. H. et al. Comprehensive characterization of cancer driver genes and mutations. Cell 173, 371–385 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Thorsson, V. et al. The immune landscape of cancer. Immunity 48, 812–830 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Miao, D. et al. Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint blockade in microsatellite-stable solid tumors. Nat. Genet. 50, 1271–1281 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Liu, D. et al. Integrative molecular and clinical modeling of clinical outcomes to PD1 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Nat. Med. 25, 1916–1927 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Mermel, C. H., Schumacher, S. E., Hill, B., Meyerson, M. L., Beroukhim, R. & Getz, G. GISTIC20 facilitates sensitive and confident localization of the targets of focal somatic copy-number alteration in human cancers. Genome Biol. 12, R41 (2011).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Federico, A. & Monti, S. hypeR: an R package for geneset enrichment workflows. Bioinformatics 36, 1307–1308 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    McFarland, J. M. et al. Improved estimation of cancer dependencies from large-scale RNAi screens using model-based normalization and data integration. Nat. Commun. 9, 4610 (2018).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Meyers, R. M. et al. Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells. Nat. Genet. 49, 1779–1784 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Ben-David, U. et al. Patient-derived xenografts undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution. Nat. Genet. 49, 1567–1575 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *