Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J. & Youngblood, J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 3941–3994 (2011). A critical review on structure–property relationships in cellulose nanomaterials.
Google Scholar
Isogai, A. Development of completely dispersed cellulose nanofibers. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B 94, 161–179 (2018).
Google Scholar
Isogai, A., Saito, T. & Fukuzumi, H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3, 71–85 (2011). The first paper on TEMPO treatment of nanocellulose.
Google Scholar
Chen, C. et al. Structure–property–function relationships of natural and engineered wood. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 642–666 (2020).
Google Scholar
Isogai, A. Present situation and future prospects of Nanocellulose R&D in Japan. In 2018 Int. Conf. Nanotechnology for Renewable Materials (18NANO) (TAPPI, 2018).
Arasto, A., Koljonen, T. & Similä, L. (eds) Growth by Integrating Bioeconomy and Low-Carbon Economy: Scenarios for Finland until 2050 (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2018); https://cris.vtt.fi/en/publications/growth-by-integrating-bioeconomy-and-low-carbon-economy-scenarios.
Šturcová, A., Davies, G. R. & Eichhorn, S. J. Elastic modulus and stress-transfer properties of tunicate cellulose whiskers. Biomacromolecules 6, 1055–1061 (2005). An early report on the mechanical properties of crystalline cellulose.
Google Scholar
Mark, R. E. Cell Wall Mechanics of Tracheids (Elliots, 1967).
Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose: From Nature to High Performance Tailored Materials (Walter de Gruyter, 2017).
Trovatti, E. et al. Enhancing strength and toughness of cellulose nanofibril network structures with an adhesive peptide. Carbohydr. Polym. 181, 256–263 (2018).
Google Scholar
Park, H. J., Weller, C. L., Vergano, P. J. & Testin, R. F. Permeability and mechanical properties of cellulose-based edible films. J. Food Sci. 58, 1361–1364 (1993).
Google Scholar
Mittal, N. et al. Multiscale control of nanocellulose assembly: transferring remarkable nanoscale fibril mechanics to macroscale fibers. ACS Nano 12, 6378–6388 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mittal, N. et al. Ultrastrong and bioactive nanostructured bio-based composites. ACS Nano 11, 5148–5159 (2017).
Google Scholar
Håkansson, K. M. O. et al. Hydrodynamic alignment and assembly of nanofibrils resulting in strong cellulose filaments. Nat. Commun. 5, 4018 (2014).
Google Scholar
Torres-Rendon, J. G., Schacher, F. H., Ifuku, S. & Walther, A. Mechanical performance of macrofibers of cellulose and chitin nanofibrils aligned by wet-stretching: a critical comparison. Biomacromolecules 15, 2709–2717 (2014).
Google Scholar
Fukuzumi, H., Saito, T., Iwata, T., Kumamoto, Y. & Isogai, A. Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 10, 162–165 (2009).
Google Scholar
Yang, X., Reid, M. S., Olsén, P. & Berglund, L. A. Eco-friendly cellulose nanofibrils designed by nature: effects from preserving native state. ACS Nano 14, 724–735 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wu, C.-N., Yang, Q., Takeuchi, M., Saito, T. & Isogai, A. Highly tough and transparent layered composites of nanocellulose and synthetic silicate. Nanoscale 6, 392–399 (2014).
Google Scholar
Guan, Q.-F. et al. Lightweight, tough, and sustainable cellulose nanofiber-derived bulk structural materials with low thermal expansion coefficient. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz1114 (2020).
Google Scholar
Benítez, A. J., Torres-Rendon, J., Poutanen, M. & Walther, A. Humidity and multiscale structure govern mechanical properties and deformation modes in films of native cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules 14, 4497–4506 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sehaqui, H. et al. Cellulose nanofiber orientation in nanopaper and nanocomposites by cold drawing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 4, 1043–1049 (2012).
Google Scholar
Benítez, A. J. & Walther, A. Counterion size and nature control structural and mechanical response in cellulose nanofibril nanopapers. Biomacromolecules 18, 1642–1653 (2017).
Google Scholar
Song, J. et al. Processing bulk natural wood into a high-performance structural material. Nature 554, 224–228 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lundahl, M. J., Klar, V., Wang, L., Ago, M. & Rojas, O. J. Spinning of cellulose nanofibrils into filaments: a review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56, 8–19 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yang, X. & Berglund, L. A. Water-based approach to high-strength all-cellulose material with optical transparency. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 501–510 (2018). An early report on high-strength all-cellulose films.
Google Scholar
Feng, Y., Zhang, X., Shen, Y., Yoshino, K. & Feng, W. A mechanically strong, flexible and conductive film based on bacterial cellulose/graphene nanocomposite. Carbohydr. Polym. 87, 644–649 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. A printed, recyclable, ultra-strong, and ultra-tough graphite structural material. Mater. Today 30, 17–25 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, A., Walther, A., Ikkala, O., Belova, L. & Berglund, L. A. Clay nanopaper with tough cellulose nanofiber matrix for fire retardancy and gas barrier functions. Biomacromolecules 12, 633–641 (2011).
Google Scholar
Biswas, S. K., Sano, H., Shams, Md. I. & Yano, H. Three-dimensional-moldable nanofiber-reinforced transparent composites with a hierarchically self-assembled “reverse” nacre-like architecture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 9, 30177–30184 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. Super-strong, super-stiff macrofibers with aligned, long bacterial cellulose nanofibers. Adv. Mater. 29, 1702498 (2017).
Lightweight Materials for Cars and Trucks https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/lightweight-materials-cars-and-trucks (Vehicle Technologies Office, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 2014).
NCV Cellulose Nano Fiber Vehicle http://www.rish.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ncv/ (Ministry of the Environment, 2019).
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R. & Law, K. L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700782 (2017).
Google Scholar
PlasticsEurope https://www.plasticseurope.org/en (accessed October 2019).
Ritchie, H. & Roser, M. Plastic pollution. In Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution (2018).
Albertsson, A.-C. & Hakkarainen, M. Designed to degrade. Science 358, 872–873 (2017).
Google Scholar
Thakur, S. et al. Sustainability of bioplastics: opportunities and challenges. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 13, 68–75 (2018).
Coughlan, M. P. Mechanisms of cellulose degradation by fungi and bacteria. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 32, 77–100 (1991).
Google Scholar
Wang, S., Lu, A. & Zhang, L. Recent advances in regenerated cellulose materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 53, 169–206 (2016).
Google Scholar
Holland, C., Vollrath, F., Ryan, A. J. & Mykhaylyk, O. O. Silk and synthetic polymers: reconciling 100 degrees of separation. Adv. Mater. 24, 105–109 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sharma, A., Thakur, M., Bhattacharya, M., Mandal, T. & Goswami, S. Commercial application of cellulose nano-composites—a review. Biotechnol. Rep. 21, e00316 (2019).
Cowie, J., Bilek, E. T., Wegner, T. H. & Shatkin, J. A. Market projections of cellulose nanomaterial-enabled products. Part 2: Volume estimates. TAPPI J. 13, 57–69 (2014).
Google Scholar
Babu, R. P., O’Connor, K. & Seeram, R. Current progress on bio-based polymers and their future trends. Prog. Biomater. 2, 8 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q. Q. et al. Approaching zero cellulose loss in cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) production: recovery and characterization of cellulosic solid residues (CSR) and CNC. Cellulose 19, 2033–2047 (2012).
Google Scholar
Chen, L., Zhu, J. Y., Baez, C., Kitin, P. & Elder, T. Highly thermal-stable and functional cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils produced using fully recyclable organic acids. Green Chem. 18, 3835–3843 (2016). An original report on the fabrication cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibres using concentrated organic acids.
Google Scholar
Yarbrough, J. M. et al. Multifunctional cellulolytic enzymes outperform processive fungal cellulases for coproduction of nanocellulose and biofuels. ACS Nano 11, 3101–3109 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhou, H., St John, F. & Zhu, J. Y. Xylanase pretreatment of wood fibers for producing cellulose nanofibrils: a comparison of different enzyme preparations. Cellulose 26, 543–555 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hata, Y., Sawada, T., Sakai, T. & Serizawa, T. Enzyme-catalyzed bottom-up synthesis of mechanically and physicochemically stable cellulose hydrogels for spatial immobilization of functional colloidal particles. Biomacromolecules 19, 1269–1275 (2018).
Google Scholar
Koskela, S. et al. Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase (LPMO) mediated production of ultra-fine cellulose nanofibres from delignified softwood fibres. Green Chem. 21, 5924–5933 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kracher, D. et al. Extracellular electron transfer systems fuel cellulose oxidative degradation. Science 352, 1098–1101 (2016).
Google Scholar
Nogi, M., Iwamoto, S., Nakagaito, A. N. & Yano, H. Optically transparent nanofiber paper. Adv. Mater. 21, 1595–1598 (2009). An early report on cellulose-nanofibre-based transparent paper.
Google Scholar
Fang, Z. et al. Novel nanostructured paper with ultrahigh transparency and ultrahigh haze for solar cells. Nano Lett. 14, 765–773 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hsieh, M.-C., Koga, H., Suganuma, K. & Nogi, M. Hazy transparent cellulose nanopaper. Sci. Rep. 7, 41590 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lin, C. et al. Preparation of highly hazy transparent cellulose film from dissolving pulp. Cellulose 26, 4061–4069 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nogi, M. et al. High thermal stability of optical transparency in cellulose nanofiber paper. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 181911 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ifuku, S. et al. Surface modification of bacterial cellulose nanofibers for property enhancement of optically transparent composites: dependence on acetyl-group DS. Biomacromolecules 8, 1973–1978 (2007).
Google Scholar
Zhu, H. et al. Extreme light management in mesoporous wood cellulose paper for optoelectronics. ACS Nano 10, 1369–1377 (2016).
Google Scholar
Toivonen, M. S. et al. Anomalous-diffusion-assisted brightness in white cellulose nanofibril membranes. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704050 (2018). A recent report on the mechanism of the tunable optical whiteness of cellulose nanofibre films.
Liang, H.-L. et al. Roll-to-roll fabrication of touch-responsive cellulose photonic laminates. Nat. Commun. 9, 4632 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. Moisture and oxygen barrier properties of cellulose nanomaterial-based films. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 49–70 (2018).
Google Scholar
Liu, Q. et al. Flexible transparent aerogels as window retrofitting films and optical elements with tunable birefringence. Nano Energy 48, 266–274 (2018). A recent report on thermally insulating and transparent cellulose films.
Google Scholar
Li, T. et al. A radiative cooling structural material. Science 364, 760–763 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lv, T., Huang, J., Liu, W. & Zhang, R. From sky back to sky: embedded transparent cellulose membrane to improve the thermal performance of solar module by radiative cooling. Case Studies Therm. Eng. 18, 100596 (2020).
Okahisa, Y., Yoshida, A., Miyaguchi, S. & Yano, H. Optically transparent wood–cellulose nanocomposite as a base substrate for flexible organic light-emitting diode displays. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 1958–1961 (2009).
Google Scholar
Jung, Y. H. et al. High-performance green flexible electronics based on biodegradable cellulose nanofibril paper. Nat. Commun. 6, 7170 (2015).
Google Scholar
World Health Organization 2.1 Billion People Lack Safe Drinking Water At Home, More Than Twice As Many Lack Safe Sanitation. https://www.who.int/news/item/12-07-2017-2-1-billion-people-lack-safe-drinking-water-at-home-more-than-twice-as-many-lack-safe-sanitation (WHO, 2017).
Li, T. et al. Cellulose ionic conductors with high differential thermal voltage for low-grade heat harvesting. Nat. Mater. 18, 608–613 (2019). An original report on highly conductive cellulose nanostructures for thermal energy harvesting.
Google Scholar
Karim, Z., Mathew, A. P., Kokol, V., Wei, J. & Grahn, M. High-flux affinity membranes based on cellulose nanocomposites for removal of heavy metal ions from industrial effluents. RSC Adv. 6, 20644–20653 (2016).
Google Scholar
Voisin, H., Bergström, L., Liu, P. & Mathew, A. Nanocellulose-based materials for water purification. Nanomaterials 7, 57 (2017).
Kim, S.-H. et al. Flexible/shape-versatile, bipolar all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries prepared by multistage printing. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 321–330 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H. et al. Nanomat Li–S batteries based on all-fibrous cathode/separator assemblies and reinforced Li metal anodes: towards ultrahigh energy density and flexibility. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 177–186 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, T. et al. A nanofluidic ion regulation membrane with aligned cellulose nanofibers. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau4238 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jiang, Q. et al. Bilayered biofoam for highly efficient solar steam generation. Adv. Mater. 28, 9400–9407 (2016).
Google Scholar
Mohammed, N., Grishkewich, N. & Tam, K. C. Cellulose nanomaterials: promising sustainable nanomaterials for application in water/wastewater treatment processes. Environ. Sci. Nano 5, 623–658 (2018).
Google Scholar
Czaja, W., Krystynowicz, A., Bielecki, S. & Brown, R. M. Microbial cellulose—the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 27, 145–151 (2006).
Google Scholar
Hickey, R. J. & Pelling, A. E. Cellulose biomaterials for tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7, 45 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sun, B. et al. Applications of cellulose-based materials in sustained drug delivery systems. Curr. Med. Chem. 26, 2485–2501 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yamada, K., Shibata, H., Suzuki, K. & Citterio, D. Toward practical application of paper-based microfluidics for medical diagnostics: state-of-the-art and challenges. Lab Chip 17, 1206–1249 (2017).
Google Scholar
An, B. W., Heo, S., Ji, S., Bien, F. & Park, J.-U. Transparent and flexible fingerprint sensor array with multiplexed detection of tactile pressure and skin temperature. Nat. Commun. 9, 2458 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhao, D. et al. A dynamic gel with reversible and tunable topological networks and performances. Matter 2, 390–403 (2020).
Czaja, W. K., Young, D. J., Kawecki, M. & Brown, R. M. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8, 1–12 (2007).
Google Scholar
Shoseyov, O. et al. Nanocellulose composite biomaterials in industry and medicine. In Extracellular Sugar-Based Biopolymers Matrices (eds Cohen, E. & Merzendorfer, H.) Vol. 12, 693–784 (Springer, 2019).
Scherner, M. et al. In vivo application of tissue-engineered blood vessels of bacterial cellulose as small arterial substitutes: proof of concept? J. Surg. Res. 189, 340–347 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ajdary, R., Tardy, B. L., Mattos, B. D., Bai, L. & Rojas, O. J. Plant nanomaterials and inspiration from nature: water interactions and hierarchically structured hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 2001085 (2020).
UPM Biomedicals https://www.upm.com/businesses/upm-biomedicals/
Greca, L. G., Lehtonen, J., Tardy, B. L., Guo, J. & Rojas, O. J. Biofabrication of multifunctional nanocellulosic 3D structures: a facile and customizable route. Mater. Horiz. 5, 408–415 (2018). An original report on the synthesis of three-dimensional nanocellulose structures.
Google Scholar
Ajdary, R. et al. Acetylated nanocellulose for single-component bioinks and cell proliferation on 3D-printed scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 20, 2770–2778 (2019).
Google Scholar
Huan, S. et al. Two-phase emulgels for direct ink writing of skin-bearing architectures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1902990 (2019).
Drachuk, I. et al. Immobilization of recombinant E. coli cells in a bacterial cellulose–silk composite matrix to preserve biological function. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3, 2278–2292 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sun, M., Wang, Y., Shi, L. & Klemeš, J. J. Uncovering energy use, carbon emissions and environmental burdens of pulp and paper industry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 92, 823–833 (2018). A critical review summarizing the energy use, carbon emissions and environmental impact of the pulp and paper industry.
Ma, X. et al. Energy and carbon coupled water footprint analysis for straw pulp paper production. J. Clean. Prod. 233, 23–32 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, J., Tavakoli, J. & Tang, Y. Bacterial cellulose production, properties and applications with different culture methods—a review. Carbohydr. Polym. 219, 63–76 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shoda, M. & Sugano, Y. Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 10, 1 (2005).
Google Scholar
Shi, Z., Zhang, Y., Phillips, G. O. & Yang, G. Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll. 35, 539–545 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lin, D., Liu, Z., Shen, R., Chen, S. & Yang, X. Bacterial cellulose in food industry: current research and future prospects. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 158, 1007–1019 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rol, F. et al. Pilot-scale twin screw extrusion and chemical pretreatment as an energy-efficient method for the production of nanofibrillated cellulose at high solid content. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 6524–6531 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hu, W. et al. Protonation process to enhance the water resistance of transparent and hazy paper. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 12385–12392 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jiang, B. et al. Lignin as a wood-inspired binder enabled strong, water stable, and biodegradable paper for plastic replacement. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1906307 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hubbe, M. A. Paper’s resistance to wetting—a review of internal sizing chemicals and their effects. BioResources 2, 106–145 (2007).
Isogai, A., Hänninen, T., Fujisawa, S. & Saito, T. Catalytic oxidation of cellulose with nitroxyl radicals under aqueous conditions. Prog. Polym. Sci. 86, 122–148 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rorrer, N. A. et al. Renewable unsaturated polyesters from muconic acid. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4, 6867–6876 (2016).
Google Scholar
Inglis, A. J., Nebhani, L., Altintas, O., Schmidt, F. G. & Barner-Kowollik, C. Rapid bonding/debonding on demand: reversibly cross-linked functional polymers via Diels−Alder chemistry. Macromolecules 43, 5515–5520 (2010).
Google Scholar
Ghanadpour, M., Carosio, F., Larsson, P. T. & Wågberg, L. Phosphorylated cellulose nanofibrils: a renewable nanomaterial for the preparation of intrinsically flame-retardant materials. Biomacromolecules 16, 3399–3410 (2015).
Google Scholar
Qin, S. et al. Super gas barrier and fire resistance of nanoplatelet/nanofibril multilayer thin films. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 6, 1801424 (2019).
Mohamed, A. L. & Hassabo, A. G. Flame retardant of cellulosic materials and their composites. In Flame Retardants: Polymer Blends, Composites and Nanocomposites (eds Visakh, P. M. & Arao, Y.) 247–314 (Springer, 2015).
Carosio, F., Kochumalayil, J., Fina, A. & Berglund, L. A. Extreme thermal shielding effects in nanopaper based on multilayers of aligned clay nanoplatelets in cellulose nanofiber matrix. Adv. Mater. Interf. 3, 1600551 (2016).
Carosio, F., Kochumalayil, J., Cuttica, F., Camino, G. & Berglund, L. Oriented clay nanopaper from biobased components—mechanisms for superior fire protection properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 7, 5847–5856 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gan, W. et al. Dense, self-formed char layer enables a fire-retardant wood structural material. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1807444 (2019).
Thoorens, G., Krier, F., Leclercq, B., Carlin, B. & Evrard, B. Microcrystalline cellulose, a direct compression binder in a quality by design environment—a review. Int. J. Pharm. 473, 64–72 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bai, L. et al. Oil-in-water Pickering emulsions via microfluidization with cellulose nanocrystals. 2. In vitro lipid digestion. Food Hydrocoll. 96, 709–716 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lin, K. W. & Lin, H. Y. Quality characteristics of Chinese-style meatball containing bacterial cellulose (nata). J. Food Sci. 69, SNQ107–SNQ111 (2004).
Google Scholar
Ong, K. J., Shatkin, J. A., Nelson, K., Ede, J. D. & Retsina, T. Establishing the safety of novel bio-based cellulose nanomaterials for commercialization. NanoImpact 6, 19–29 (2017). A recent report on the development of a safety testing plan for lignin-coated cellulose nanofibre and nanocrystals.
Zhou, B., Fu, M., Xie, J., Yang, X. & Li, Z. Ecological functions of bamboo forest: research and application. J. For. Res. 16, 143–147 (2005).
Yu, Y., Wang, H., Lu, F., Tian, G. & Lin, J. Bamboo fibers for composite applications: a mechanical and morphological investigation. J. Mater. Sci. 49, 2559–2566 (2014).
Google Scholar
Klein, B. C., Sampaio, I. L. de M., Mantelatto, P. E., Filho, R. M. & Bonomi, A. Beyond ethanol, sugar, and electricity: a critical review of product diversification in Brazilian sugarcane mills. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 13, 809–821 (2019).
Google Scholar
Imani, M. et al. Coupling nanofibril lateral size and residual lignin to tailor the properties of lignocellulose films. Adv. Mater. Interf. 6, 1900770 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stone, J. E. & Scallan, A. M. Effect of component removal upon the porous structure of the cell wall of wood. J. Polym. Sci. C 11, 13–25 (1965).
Crowther, T. W. et al. Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature 525, 201–205 (2015).
Google Scholar
Henn, A. R. & Fraundorf, P. B. A quantitative measure of the degree of fibrillation of short reinforcing fibres. J. Mater. Sci. 25, 3659–3663 (1990).
Google Scholar
Zhu, H. et al. Wood-derived materials for green electronics, biological devices, and energy applications. Chem. Rev. 116, 9305–9374 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q. Q. et al. Morphological development of cellulose fibrils of a bleached eucalyptus pulp by mechanical fibrillation. Cellulose 19, 1631–1643 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zhu, H. et al. Anomalous scaling law of strength and toughness of cellulose nanopaper. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8971–8976 (2015).
Google Scholar
Redefining bioeconomy. FinnCERES https://www.finnceres.fi/.
La Notte, L. et al. Fully-sprayed flexible polymer solar cells with a cellulose-graphene electrode. Mater. Today Energy 7, 105–112 (2018).